The districts are seen as longshots for Democrats; DMFI PAC’s Brian Romick said, ‘Winning battleground districts like theirs is essential to building a broad coalition’
Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images
Rep. Don Davis (D-NC) greets early voters at the Craven County Board of Elections office in New Bern, N.C., on the first day of early voting on Thursday, October 15, 2026.
Democratic Majority for Israel’s PAC announced on Thursday that it will spend $7 million to fund digital, television and radio ads supporting Reps. Don Davis (D-NC) and Shomari Figures (D-AL).
Both districts were seen as longshots for Democrats after Republicans redrew the maps in North Carolina and Alabama to strongly favor the GOP in both seats. The Cook Political Report rates Davis’ seat as a “toss up” and Figures’ race as “likely Republican.”
The group is set to spend $2 million supporting Figures and $5 million supporting Davis, according to Punchbowl News.
“With less than two weeks to go till Election Day, DMFI PAC is all in to back principled, pro-Israel Democrats Don Davis and Shomari Figures, both of whom face tougher elections thanks to Republican redistricting,” DMFI PAC President Brian Romick said in a statement. “Winning battleground districts like theirs is essential to building a broad coalition, winning back the House majority, and putting Hakeem Jeffries in the speaker’s chair. DMFI PAC is proud to support strong congressmen like Don and Shomari ahead of this critical election.”
In a statement shared on X, DMFI noted that it is “proud to support our friends in the Congressional Black Caucus.”
Ahead of election day, DMFI is also backing former Rep. Elaine Luria (D-VA) in a Virginia swing seat.
Recent polling by Davis supporters has shown him with a healthy lead over his GOP opponent, Laurie Buckhout, while Buckhout internal polling has put her narrowly ahead. Davis, initially elected with support from AIPAC’s super PAC, has been a vocal supporter of Israel in office.
Figures has also been supportive of Israel, including voting earlier this year against an amendment to cut off U.S. aid to the Jewish state.
DMFI President Brian Romick: ‘We are equally clear that there is no lasting peace without Israeli responsibility and no Palestinian state without credible Palestinian governance’
Adobe Stock
Two flags: American and Israeli waving in the blue sky
Democratic Majority for Israel, the Democratic pro-Israel advocacy group, released a proposal on Thursday for a “modernized U.S.-Israel relationship,” with a focus on reimagined ties between the countries following the end of the current memorandum of understanding on military aid, set to expire in 2028.
The plan comes as Democrats grapple with the future of the U.S.-Israel relationship, particularly ahead of a potential Democratic majority in one or both chambers of Congress, which could bring renewed efforts to end or substantially condition U.S. military aid and sales to the Jewish state.
The framework laid out by DMFI mirrors the policies likely to be championed by moderate pro-Israel Democrats in the coming Congress.
“‘Cut everything’ and ‘defend everything’ are shortcuts. Neither is a serious policy for advancing peace in the region,” DMFI said in a press release. “Our vision offers a path grounded in security, responsibility, regional cooperation, and sustained American leadership.”
DMFI said that the U.S. should fulfill its commitments on military aid through the end of the current MOU, arguing that failing to do so “would diminish the close defense partnership through which the United States and Israel plan, develop, and produce the capabilities both countries need to confront shared threats.”
The group maintained that the U.S. and the region “have far more to gain from a stronger and more effective partnership” than from cutting off the U.S.-Israel relationship, and that the path forward will help secure military victories against Iran and its proxies, protect American troops and civilians, support regional partners and strengthen the path toward a two-state solution.
Beyond 2028, the group urged focusing on “more joint development and production in missile defense, cybersecurity, and emerging technologies” — which itself has proven to be a controversial idea among some congressional Democrats and, to a lesser extent, Republicans.
But it also did not fully rule out the potential for “some” continued military aid and missile defense funding past 2028, while suggesting that such aid would likely be phased out “over time, and by mutual agreement … toward an increasingly reciprocal relationship centered on joint investment, innovation, and technological advantage.”
And it said that the U.S. still “has a strategic and moral interest in ensuring that Israel can deter and defend against threats to Israel’s fundamental security,” including preserving Israel’s qualitative military edge and ensuring that Israel maintains access to the military capabilities it needs.
DMFI said that cooperative military programs redound to the U.S.’ benefit, allowing “access to capabilities, operational experience, and regional insights that would be difficult and costly to replicate independently,” while allowing Israel and other partners to “shoulder more of the security burden” while the U.S. turns attention toward China and the Indo-Pacific.
The group emphasized that continued support for Israel “does not require support for every decision made by an Israeli government” and that the U.S. should speak out when Israel undermines “shared interests, democratic values, prospects for peace, or Israel’s own long-term security” and work with Israel to ensure that security assistance “continues to be used in accordance with U.S. law and that military operations incorporate effective measures to minimize civilian harm.”
But it also firmly rejected the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement and other efforts to delegitimize Israel and deny its right to exist as a Jewish state, as well as double standards singling out Israel.
“Criticism of Israeli governments and policies is legitimate, but political debate about Israel must never become a vehicle for antisemitism or collective blame of Jews,” the DMFI plan argues.
It said that the U.S., Israel, Palestinians and Arab states should continue to push toward a two-state solution, and that such a path includes obligations for both Israelis and Palestinians, and steps to improve conditions for Palestinians even without broader final-status negotiations.
The group said Israel must act to halt settler violence in the West Bank; “preserve the territorial integrity, economic viability, and institutional capacity necessary for legitimate Palestinian governance and eventual statehood”; and not work to weaken the Palestinian Authority, arguing that it’s in Israel’s interest to ensure stronger PA institutions and economic conditions as an alternative to extremism.
At the same time, DMFI’s plan describes Israeli skepticism of and concern about a Palestinian state as valid and based on Israel’s experience, particularly in the Oct. 7, 2023 attacks, and said that security arrangements around a two-state solution must “give Israelis confidence that a future Palestinian state will not become another base for terrorism.”
It also argues that the PA is a critical part of a two-state solution but must be significantly reformed to reject terrorism, support Hamas’ removal, stop incitement, overhaul educational materials that incite terrorism, combat corruption and improve governance.
“A reformed PA must demonstrate that it can serve its population, maintain security, govern responsibly, and act as a credible partner for peace before assuming responsibility for Gaza,” DMFI said. “The United States and its regional partners should help the PA undertake these reforms while establishing clear benchmarks to measure and verify progress.”
DMFI called on Arab states to work to strengthen the PA while integrating more closely with Israel.
In Gaza, the DMFI plan largely aligns with the 20-point peace plan put forward by the Trump administration, including disarming Hamas, establishing governance and ensuring humanitarian assistance, which “will require sustained American leadership and diplomatic engagement over many years.”
It argues that recovery and reconstruction should start in Israeli-controlled areas with a shift toward civilian governance and international oversight.
The plan speaks in broad strokes about a path forward for Iran, describing diplomacy as “an essential tool” to addressing Iran’s various threats, “backed by credible deterrence, rigorous verification, economic pressure, and close coordination with allies and regional partners,” alongside “military force [when] necessary” with clear goals and congressional authorization.
It also calls on Lebanon to disarm Hezbollah and offers support for “stable governance” in Syria that will block Iran and other terrorist groups from using Syrian territory to attack Israel.
“DMFI is proposing a vision for the Middle East that a Democratic majority can actually govern with: security for Israel, self-determination for the Palestinian people, and stability for the region, with every party carrying obligations you can name, measure, and verify,” DMFI President Brian Romick said in a statement. “Our commitment to Israel’s security is ironclad, and we are equally clear that there is no lasting peace without Israeli responsibility and no Palestinian state without credible Palestinian governance.”
Former Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel, who is seen as a potential presidential contender, also praised the plan. The Democratic operative delivered a major speech in Israel earlier this year offering criticisms of Israeli policy and calling for an end of unconditional support for the Jewish state.
“DMFI is right to put regional stability, Israel’s security, and Palestinian self-determination in the same conversation. None succeeds on its own,” Emanuel said. “The next step is to make the Arab states full partners in building a credible path to Palestinian sovereignty and Israeli security — and to be clear that America’s support for Israel does not mean silence when its government makes choices that undermine both.”
Rep. Lois Frankel (D-FL), the ranking member of the House Appropriations Committee subcommittee that oversees U.S. military aid to Israel, said in a statement on the proposal that “U.S. partnership with Israel is essential to our national security and to advancing peace and stability in the Middle East” and that the DMFI plan “offer[s] a thoughtful and serious vision for strengthening that relationship to meet today’s challenges, while making clear that American interests, Israel’s security and Palestinian self-determination can be advanced together.”
Rep. Brad Schneider (D-IL), who co-chairs the Congressional Jewish Caucus and the Abraham Accords Caucus and is a leader among moderate pro-Israel Democrats, said, “Especially at this critical moment, it is vitally important to chart a course that strengthens the U.S.-Israel relationship and advances our mutual security interests and shared democratic values. I look forward to working with DMFI and others committed to this effort to help shape that future.”
The digital ad targets Luria’s opponent, Rep. Jen Kiggans, over her support for Trump’s policies
Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images
Former Rep. Elaine Luria (D-VA) testifies in the Capitol Visitor Center on January 6, 2026.
Democratic Majority for Israel’s PAC announced Tuesday that it is launching a $1 million digital ad campaign targeting Rep. Jen Kiggans (R-VA), who is running against former Rep. Elaine Luria (D-VA).
The toss-up Tidewater Virginia seat is a top target for Democrats in November, one of several districts that DMFI is working to help Democrats flip in the midterms. Luria was among the most outspoken supporters of Israel on Capitol Hill during her two terms in office.
The ad focuses on hitting Kiggans over her support of President Donald Trump’s policies, painting her as a pawn of the president who sides with him unquestioningly.
It features a clip of Trump praising Kiggans.
“Elaine Luria has a proven record of putting her district first, standing up for our servicemembers and veterans, and being a strong voice for the U.S.-Israel relationship. DMFI PAC’s Majority Project is fighting to win back the House, and VA-02 is one of the seats that will decide it. We’re all-in to send Elaine Luria back to Congress,” DMFI PAC Brian Romick said in a statement.
Kiggans campaign spokesman Calvin Moore called the ad “blatantly false” and said “Elaine Luria’s allies should be ashamed to run it.”
“Their ‘100%’ lie relies on an outdated and inaccurate analysis white ignoring Congresswoman Kiggans’ clear record of standing up to both parties when it’s right for Virginia,” Moore said, referring to a claim in the ad that she has voted 100% of the time with Trump, which does not reflect her complete voting record. “From taking on her own party to protect green energy jobs to standing up to Republicans to protect affordable health care, it’s why Kiggans is consistently rated one of the most bipartisan Members of Congress.”
DMFI also launched paid advertisements backing Johnny Garcia and Marni von Wilpert, Democratic candidates in Texas and California, earlier in the congressional cycle.
DMFI President Brian Romick: ‘Our hope is that this pause will be temporary and that, through a candid conversation about the path forward, we can resume our endorsement’
Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images
Rep. Pat Ryan (D-NY) speaks during a Democratic Steering and Policy Committee hearing in the U.S. Capitol on April 10, 2025 in Washington, DC
DMFI PAC, Democratic Majority for Israel’s political arm, is pausing its endorsements of nine Democratic House members who voted this month to end all U.S. aid to Israel, underscoring the depth of its frustration even as the group also seeks to preserve relationships with lawmakers it had championed.
In a new letter that the group intends to circulate among the lawmakers, Brian Romick, the president of DMFI PAC, expressed his disappointment with their votes in favor of the amendment introduced by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), which did not pass, and said their endorsements would be temporarily suspended with a goal of engaging in a constructive dialogue on the issue.
“Because of that vote, we are pausing our endorsement and taking your name off the list of supported lawmakers on the DMFI PAC website,” Romick said in the letter, the full text of which was shared exclusively with Jewish Insider on Sunday. “At the same time,” he added, “our hope is that this pause will be temporary and that, through a candid conversation about the path forward, we can resume our endorsement.”
The Democrats include Reps. Laura Friedman (D-CA), Josh Harder (D-CA), Chrissy Houlahan (D-PA), Glenn Ivey (D-MD), Kevin Mullin (D-CA), Richard Neal (D-MA), Joe Neguse (D-CO), Brittany Pettersen (D-CO) and Pat Ryan (D-NY).
DMFI PAC has previously backed other pro-Israel Democrats who also voted against funding to Israel, notably including Rep. Jake Auchincloss (D-MA). But the nine members now receiving letters were the only incumbents it had endorsed this cycle who approved the amendment, according to a spokesperson.
DMFI PAC’s diplomatic approach highlights the politically sensitive terrain that pro-Israel groups find themselves navigating after the controversial vote. The amendment drew backing from a total of 103 House Democrats, nearly half the caucus, many of whom were seen as supporters of Israel and said they approved the measure to register opposition to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as well as the Iran war.
The group’s decision comes after AIPAC retaliated against 18 of its Democratic endorsees who voted for the amendment by removing fundraising links from its online political portal or cutting language that had thanked some members for their support of Israel.
In an interview with JI on Sunday, Romick said the group’s intention with the letter is “to give people a path back to the pro-Israel movement” rather than permanently ending its longstanding relationships over a measure that it had strongly urged Democrats to vote against.
“Obviously it was a rough vote and it’s been a rough moment,” Romick acknowledged. “But the pro-Israel movement right now needs to be making friends, and I think being able to say ‘I support Israel’s security, I support Palestinians’ national aspirations over the long term, even if it’s not something today’ — I think that’s a reasonable position” and “we want to try to help Democrats land there and continue to support Israel’s security.”
He believes “members are looking for a path back to being in the pro-Israel movement,” he said, citing his recent conversations with House lawmakers. “I don’t think we should be pushing away friends right now.”
It remains to be seen whether all of the former DMFI PAC endorsees will be receptive to preserving “strong relationships and open channels of communication,” as described in the letter from Romick.
A spokesperson for Ryan, for example, said after the vote that he no longer wanted DMFI PAC’s support. The moderate New York lawmaker also promised to return his campaign donations from AIPAC, whose backing he likewise rejected in a social media post.
An AIPAC spokesperson told JI last week that its “members nationwide saw Rep. Ryan reject their participation in the political process,” and said the group is now “helping his donors receive a refund.”
Rep. Brad Schneider (D-IL), a pro-Israel stalwart who voted against the amendment, told JI he was encouraged by DMFI’s outreach to the lawmakers whose endorsements have been paused. “I think it’s the right decision,” he told JI.
“I know that if we’re going to improve the prospects for positive outcomes in the Middle East,” he added, “we need to find common ground with people across a lot of different ideas and ideologies, bring people together and move forward in a single direction, and that’s what I hope we can do.”
Jewish organizations across the political spectrum question whether the deal will curb Iran’s nuclear program or its support for regional proxies
Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images
President Donald Trump conducts a news conference in the White House briefing room about the war in Iran on Monday, April 6, 2026.
As details begin to emerge about the Trump administration’s agreement with Iran to end the war and lift the U.S. blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, some mainstream Jewish organizations are treating the deal as a preliminary step — focusing on the 60-day negotiating period ahead, while others are expressing skepticism about the contours of the agreement.
AIPAC, in a statement that came late Monday afternoon after many other organizations had already spoken out, framed the current MOU as a preliminary step, focusing more on the upcoming negotiations, while emphasizing the need for more details about how the current deal affects Israel.
“The announced MOU kicks off a new 60-day window for talks. We look forward to learning the full details of the framework for these negotiations, including whether the deal preserves the sovereign right of our democratic ally Israel to respond to the security threats it confronts,” AIPAC said in a statement.
The group also emphasized that “Congress will play a critical role in working with the administration throughout these negotiations and in reviewing the ultimate agreement.”
It said any deal should require the removal of all enriched uranium from Iran, the dismantling of its enrichment capacity and should address Iran’s missile and drone programs and end its support for terrorist proxies.
The American Jewish Committee also did not take a definitive position on the current agreement, saying on X that the organization “await[s] developments about the reported 60-day ceasefire agreement” but emphasized the need to continue to focus on Iran’s long-running threats.
The AJC said that any ultimate deal with Iran at the conclusion of the upcoming 60-day negotiating period should ensure Iran cannot obtain a nuclear weapon, rebuild its ballistic missile program, continue to support terror proxies, threaten U.S. allies and partners or hold the Strait of Hormuz hostage.
“AJC also strongly supports the legitimate aspirations of the Iranian people for greater freedom, opportunity and dignity, and hopes that those aspirations are eventually realized,” the statement continued. “As the contours of this and future agreements become more clear, we will continue to engage with our partners in the U.S., the Middle East, and around the world to make this vision a reality.”
Other groups offered a more directly negative reaction to the emerging details of the MOU.
The Zionist Organization of America, which has been strongly supportive of Trump administration policies and President Donald Trump himself, praised the president for carrying out military operations against Iran but said that “the pending deal with Iran is concerning.”
“The deal appears to be an ‘agreement to negotiate’ — which enables the Iranian regime to obtain massive oil revenue and time to build up its military and terror arsenals, while leaving the genocidal Iranian regime and its nuclear and missile stockpiles in place, and positioning the Iranian regime to continue and strengthen its 47-year war to destroy the U.S., Israel, and the West,” ZOA National President Mort Klein said. “[T]he little that we know is deeply problematic.”
Klein said it “makes no sense” for the U.S. to let up on its blockade of Iran unless Iran fully gives up its nuclear program and missile stockpile. He also expressed concerns that the deal will allow Hezbollah to regroup and rearm, and that Trump demanded that Israel stand down against Hezbollah.
“Pressuring Israel to not respond to threats of annihilation and attacks on her people is not, as the president called it, a ‘Great Deal [that] will bring Peace and Security to the whole Region,’” Klein said.
“Disturbingly, the interim Iran deal does not appear to be even close to the U.S.-Israel war goals of eliminating the existential dangers of Iran’s nuclear program and ballistic missiles, ending the Iranian regime’s support for its terror proxies, and helping the Iranian people overturn the brutal, genocidal Iranian regime,” he continued.
Democratic groups are also skeptical.
Democratic Majority for Israel CEO Brian Romick criticized the administration’s “incoherent and erratic strategy” and said that “there are concerning details about what is and isn’t in this deal.” Romick called on the administration to lean on “experienced negotiators and technical experts” in the next phases of talks, “rather than relying on friends, family, and donors.”
He said that any deal must permanently end Iran’s nuclear program, constrain its ballistic missiles, address Iran’s support for terrorism and ensure that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and Iran’s terrorist proxies do not receive additional support as a result of sanctions relief or the unfreezing of assets, and that it must be thoroughly vetted by Congress.
“Despite this tentative deal, the reality is Israel still faces constant threats from Iranian-backed terrorist groups like Hamas and Hezbollah. President Trump must not limit or interfere with our ally’s ability to defend itself from very real threats along its border,” Romick continued.
The Jewish Democratic Council of America’s CEO Halie Soifer took an even more strident tone.
“Donald Trump’s deal with Iran isn’t a deal at all. At best, it’s a statement of intention — a ‘concept of a plan’ — lacking details. At worst, it’s an admission of defeat by the United States,” Soifer said, describing it as a weaker deal than the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.
She argued that the “reckless war” gave Iran a “chokehold” on the U.S. and global economy that it will continue to exercise in the future, gave Iran a stronger hand in nuclear negotiations, solidified the current regime, harmed the Iranian people and gained the U.S. nothing.
“Today, Iran is unquestionably further from regime change — and this Iranian regime is stronger — than before the war,” Soifer said. “Trump repeatedly berated the Obama administration for offering sanctions relief and unfreezing Iranian assets as part of the JCPOA. The amount of financial benefit Iran received from the JCPOA will be dwarfed by the amount of money going to Iran following Trump’s defeat.”
Soifer also criticized Trump for sidelining and ignoring Israel throughout the talks.
J Street has thus far been an outlier in expressing support for the deal.
The group’s president, Jeremy Ben-Ami, said J Street “welcomes” the announcement, while also criticizing the war effort as a whole.
“The lesson is the same one many experts and former security officials have warned about for years: There is no sustainable military solution to the challenge posed by Iran’s nuclear diplomacy,” Ben-Ami said. “Durable constraints on Iran’s nuclear activities can only be achieved through pragmatic and sustained diplomacy.”
Ben-Ami argued that the deal would be largely similar to the JCPOA, adding, “We urge lawmakers to support this agreement to end the fighting and push to ensure future diplomatic efforts address the security threats presented by Iran.”
The Republican Jewish Coalition has not issued a full statement of its own on the deal, but has indicated support thus far, sharing on its X account two Truth Social posts from Trump about the Strait of Hormuz being reopened and the lifting of the U.S. blockade. RJC did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Plus, the race to replace Pelosi
Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images
U.S. President Donald Trump waves to the media after walking off of Air Force One at Miami International Airport on April 11, 2026 in Miami, Florida.
Good Tuesday morning.
In today’s Daily Kickoff, we do a deep dive into the race to succeed Rep. Nancy Pelosi, in what has become something of a proxy battle in the war for the identity of the Democratic Party, and report on an effort by Democratic Majority for Israel to boost a Texas congressional candidate whose far-left opponent has trafficked in antisemitic tropes. We talk to Senate Republicans about the possibility of resuming military operations against Iran, and have the scoop on Gerald Steinberg’s decision to step down from the helm of NGO Monitor early next year, and the first interview with his successor, Olga Deutsch. Also in today’s Daily Kickoff: Daniel Septimus, Rom Braslavski and Ben Shapiro.
Today’s Daily Kickoff was curated by JI Executive Editor Melissa Weiss and Israel Editor Tamara Zieve, with assists from Danielle Cohen-Kanik and Marc Rod. Have a tip? Email us here.
What We’re Watching
- Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine are both slated to testify this morning at back-to-back House and Senate Appropriations Committee budget hearings. In the afternoon, FBI Director Kash Patel will testify before Senate Appropriations.
- The Anti-Defamation League is holding a Jewish American Heritage Month reception this evening on Capitol Hill.
- Elsewhere in Washington, the Jewish Democratic Council of America is kicking off its annual summit tonight with a reception at the Watergate Hotel. The group will honor Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) and Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-MD), and will hear from Sens. Jacky Rosen (D-NV) and Mark Kelly (D-AZ) and Reps. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL), Jason Crow (D-CO), Chris Deluzio (D-PA), Maggie Goodlander (D-NH) and Chrissy Houlahan (D-PA).
- The funeral for former Anti-Defamation League head Abe Foxman, who died on Sunday, will take place this morning at Park Avenue Synagogue.
- In New York City tonight, three of the top candidates in the open congressional race in NY-12 — George Conway and Assemblymembers Alex Bores and Micah Lasher — will participate in a forum at the West Side Institutional Synagogue moderated by Jewish Insider Editor-in-Chief Josh Kraushaar.
- Elsewhere in New York, the American Jewish Committee will present Cardinal Timothy Dolan with the group’s Nostra Aetate at Sixty Award, honoring Dolan’s interfaith efforts on the 60th anniversary of the groundbreaking Vatican declaration.
- Across the Hudson, the New Jersey Globe is hosting a primary debate for the Democrats running in New Jersey’s 7th Congressional District. ER physician and former government official Tina Shah, former Navy pilot Rebecca Bennett and businessmen Brian Varela and Michael Roth will participate in tonight’s debate, which starts at 7 p.m. ET.
- Israeli Eurovision entrant Noam Battan will perform tonight when the contest’s semifinals kick off in Vienna.
What You Should Know
A QUICK WORD WITH JI’S GABBY DEUTCH
Over the last two years, the second semester of the academic year at American universities coincided with crisis and chaos. In 2024, it was anti-Israel encampments overtaking campus quads across the country; last year, it was threats from the Trump administration to slash hundreds of millions of dollars in funding and ban foreign students.
By comparison, the spring of 2026 has been relatively smooth sailing for research universities, even with a bit of hubbub over graduation speakers scrutinized for their stance on Israel and Gaza at a few schools, including the University of Michigan and Georgetown Law.
But it’s not that things have gone back to the pre-Oct. 7, pre-Donald Trump normal. University administrators have just gotten better at managing an ambient sense of friction: Conflict between university leaders and activist faculty and students is still bubbling under the surface, and the threat of funding cuts at the federal level lingers.
According to several university presidents who gathered last week at the Milken Institute Global Conference in Los Angeles, the task before universities is to win back the trust of skeptical Americans.
“The world of higher education, I think, is still in turmoil,” Vanderbilt University Chancellor Daniel Diermeier told Jewish Insider in an interview at the Milken confab. “I think the time when a university does say that’s all overblown and everything is great, that’s over. At least the vast majority of university presidents know that there are challenges, and they want to take them on.”
democratic fault lines

The race to fill the seat of Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) in California’s 11th Congressional District has become somewhat of a proxy battle in the war for the identity of the Democratic Party, where describing Israel’s war in Gaza as a genocide, supporting arms embargoes to Israel and attacking Zionism as a racist ideology have become much more common since the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas terrorist attacks and the subsequent war in Gaza, Gabe Stutman reports for Jewish Insider. The outcome of the race will help answer an important question: Can a progressive candidate still win in a deep-blue district like San Francisco without fully embracing the politics of the anti-Zionist left?
State of play: The race is by most accounts a three-way contest between state Sen. Scott Wiener, Connie Chan, a progressive member of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors who has the backing of major labor organizations but has struggled to compete in fundraising, and Saikat Chakrabarti, a wealthy tech entrepreneur who entered progressive politics working for Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) during his 2016 presidential bid and later served as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s (D-NY) chief of staff.















































































Continue with Google
Continue with Apple