
Daily Kickoff: Witkoff’s Roman holiday
Good Friday morning.
In today’s Daily Kickoff, we preview this weekend’s Iran nuclear talks in Rome, and look at how Israeli officials are viewing the diplomatic effort. We also interview Pennsylvania Budget Director Uri Monson and report on a California school district vote this week to renew an ethnic studies contract with a vendor accused of antisemitism. Also in today’s Daily Kickoff: Mark Levin, Jason Friedman and Nicola Peltz Beckham.
What We’re Watching
- Nuclear negotiations between the U.S. and Iran continue this weekend in Rome, a week after a U.S. delegation led by Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff traveled to Oman for the first round of talks.
- Before heading to Rome, Witkoff is meeting today in Paris with Israeli Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer and Mossad head David Barnea.
- Vice President JD Vance is also in Rome this weekend, where he’ll meet with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni days after her trip to Washington. Vance is also angling for a meeting with the ailing Pope Francis.
- Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro will join ABC’s George Stephanopoulos this morning on “Good Morning America” to discuss last weekend’s arson attack on the governor’s mansion.
What You Should Know
Middle East special envoy Steve Witkoff is heading to Rome this weekend to resume negotiations with Iran over the possibility of a new nuclear agreement that began last week in Oman, at a moment when the United States has squandered some of the negotiating leverage it holds over the Islamic Republic, Jewish Insider Executive Editor Melissa Weiss writes.
The meeting in Rome comes days after The New York Times reported that the Trump administration had nixed plans for Israel to strike nuclear facilities in Iran as recently as next month.
Speaking Thursday afternoon to reporters, President Donald Trump addressed the Times report. “I wouldn’t say I waved off an attack on Iran,” the president said, “but I am not in a rush to do it.”
With the military option at least temporarily off the table, the U.S. has backed itself into a corner with seemingly only one way out: through diplomacy. Trump and Witkoff are two men who have staked their reputations in part on being dealmakers, but their approach to nuclear talks with Iran has left wonks and observers wondering what the administration is trying to get out of Tehran in the first place.
Israel may now be constrained (more on that from JI’s Lahav Harkov below), but Israeli officials are still hoping to impact the negotiations. Before Witkoff heads to Rome, he’ll meet today with Israeli Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer and Mossad chief David Barnea in Paris.
Following the first round of negotiations, Witkoff appeared on Fox News on Monday night, pushing a position that focused on implementing a robust verification program around Iran’s nuclear activity — a stance that faced significant pushback from experts as well as Republicans on Capitol Hill. Rep. Mike Lawler (R-NY) sent a letter directly to Witkoff rebuking the remarks.
The pushback was so significant that Witkoff was forced to backtrack a day later, posting on his official X account on Tuesday that “[a]ny final arrangement must set a framework for peace, stability, and prosperity in the Middle East — meaning that Iran must stop and eliminate its nuclear enrichment and weaponization program.”
Legislators in Washington are increasingly weighing in on Washington’s efforts to negotiate a nuclear deal, wary of the pitfalls of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, and cognizant that any new agreement addresses the concerns that remained following the Obama administration’s signing of the deal. (More below on that.)
The initial reports of Tehran’s proposal indicate that some of the Iranian demands differ little from the 2015 deal — a deal Trump ripped up three years later.
Then-Secretary of State John Kerry defended the JCPOA by saying it was better than no deal at all. On the latest episode of Dan Senor’s “Call Me Back” podcast, Senor relayed a recent conversation with an Israeli official who noted that the Obama administration would say any alternative to the JCPOA would be followed by “international backlash” to Israel. But in the wake of the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas terror attacks, Israel is no longer concerned about backlash, the official told Senor, having faced a torrent of international criticism and retribution for the last 18 months. Further, the official said, there are countries in the region who wouldn’t join any pile-on against Israel should it mount an attack against Iran.
And the U.S. has not fully shut the door on the possibility of military action, having moved a second air carrier to the region, “Call Me Back” guest Jonathan Schanzer, the executive director of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, explained. Now, he said, Iran “has its back up against the wall,” with the very real threat of a U.S.-backed attack.
The ultimate question is whether the White House will lose too much leverage in negotiations to get a better deal or whether it will be military action – or the real threat of it – that will deal a final blow to Iran’s nuclear program.
harrisburg hesitancy
Schumer calls for federal hate crime investigation of Shapiro arson; Shapiro calls it unhelpful

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) is pressing the Department of Justice to investigate whether the arson attack on Democratic Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro’s residence constituted a federal hate crime, suggesting in a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi that the federal government’s response has been insufficient thus far, Jewish Insider’s Marc Rod reports. But Shapiro himself is deferring to local and federal prosecutors and said Schumer’s letter was unhelpful.
Back-and-forth: “Our federal authorities must bring the full weight of our civil-rights laws to bear in examining this matter. No person or public official should be targeted because of their faith, and no community should wonder whether such acts will be met with silence,” Schumer said in his letter. But Shapiro himself is taking a different approach. “‘As to Sen. Schumer or anyone else, I don’t think it’s helpful for people on the outside who haven’t seen the evidence, who don’t know what occurred, who are applying their own viewpoints to the situation, to weigh in in that manner,” he told reporters.