Chuck Schumer sidesteps whether degrading Iran’s military was a positive outcome
The Senate minority leader was pressed by MS NOW’s Joe Scarborough on his view of the U.S. and Israel’s war achievements
Samuel Corum/Getty Images
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) makes a statement alongside House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) outside of the West Wing at the White House on January 17, 2024 in Washington, DC.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) did not directly address whether the degradation of Iran’s military infrastructure should be viewed as a positive outcome, instead emphasizing the war’s potential economic and geopolitical consequences.
Over the course of the past week, U.S. officials have indicated that Iran’s military capabilities have been severely weakened. President Donald Trump has described Iran’s military as “decimated,” and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testified at a congressional hearing this past week that the Iranian regime was “largely degraded.”
When asked by MS NOW’s Joe Scarborough on Monday’s edition of “Morning Joe” whether that degradation was a “good thing,” Schumer called the question “premature.”
“You can’t [answer that question] because it’s a premature question,” Schumer said. “What is going to happen in the next several months? Is it worth it? Will the world economy collapse?”
“I can ask that question,” Scarborough replied. “I’m simply asking on the military side: Is it good — regardless of whether we agree with going in or not — is it good that Iran’s military infrastructure has been seriously degraded?”
Schumer again asserted that it could not be answered without understanding the full implications of the current conflict.
“In all due respect, if you ask the American people, if you have the choice of degrading the military structure in Iran, but having gasoline be $6 a gallon and our economy falling into a deep recession where millions lose their job, what do you think?”
Schumer ultimately signaled agreement with that underlying point, while maintaining his broader concerns.
“The fact that the leader [Ayatollah Ali] Khamenei is gone, no one regrets that. The fact that Iran has less ability to create military trouble [is a good thing], no one disputes that. But you have to look at the consequences.”
Schumer argued that Congress would have had a clearer understanding of the potential economic and geopolitical consequences had lawmakers passed one of several war powers resolutions — an effort that has been voted down by House and Senate Republicans with several Democrats joining them on several instances within the past month.
“If Republicans had voted with us on the War Powers Act, all these questions would have been asked ahead of time instead of Donald Trump’s willy-nilly — one day yes, one day no,” Schumer said.
Please log in if you already have a subscription, or subscribe to access the latest updates.




































































Continue with Google
Continue with Apple