Daily Kickoff
Good Thursday morning.
In today’s Daily Kickoff, we report on the cautious but warm reception a few Republicans on Capitol Hill are giving to President Donald Trump’s Gaza takeover proposal and spotlight Leo Terrell, who was tapped by the administration this week to lead a multiagency task force focused on combating antisemitism. We also report on the launch of the Brandeis Center’s Center for Legal Innovation to address the uptick in campus antisemitism cases, and cover Georgetown Law’s hosting of a PFLP member on campus. Also in today’s Daily Kickoff: Jay Sures, Rep. Laura Gillen and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer.
What We’re Watching
- Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu continues his trip to Washington on Capitol Hill today. He’ll meet with House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) in the early afternoon, as well as Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD), Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY).
- President Donald Trump will deliver an address at the National Prayer Breakfast in Washington this morning.
- The Senate Judiciary Committee will vote this morning on advancing the nomination of Kash Patel to be FBI director.
- In Florida, Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff is slated to meet with Qatari Prime Minister Mohammed Bin Abdul Rahman al-Thani.
- The Zionist Rabbinic Coalition is holding a web event with former Israeli Ambassador to the U.S. Michael Oren this afternoon.
What You Should Know
President Donald Trump’s comments on Tuesday about the U.S. potentially taking control of Gaza have dominated the headlines for the past two days. But another set of remarks, in which Trump repeatedly expressed his interest in a deal with Iran, could also have significant implications for the region and the new administration’s foreign policy, Jewish Insider’s Marc Rod and Emily Jacobs report.
“I would much prefer a Verified Nuclear Peace Agreement, which will let Iran peacefully grow and prosper. We should start working on it immediately, and have a big Middle East Celebration when it is signed and completed,” Trump said in a Truth Social post on Wednesday morning, elaborating on comments he’d made the day before.
The president also appeared to downplay the prospect of a U.S.-backed Israeli strike, an idea supported by a growing number of lawmakers concerned about the threat a nuclear Iran would pose to the region: “Reports that the United States, working in conjunction with Israel, is going to blow Iran into smithereens, ARE GREATLY EXAGGERATED.”
The mixed messages on Iran raise questions about whether Trump will maintain the same tough-on-Iran policy he pursued in his first term. One signal that he’s still taking a muscular line: Trump signed an executive order re-implementing maximum pressure sanctions this week (though he said he was “torn” about reimposing them and hoped they wouldn’t have to be used frequently). On the other hand, the administration has brought onmultipleindividuals who favor a more accommodationist approach to a nuclear Iran at the Pentagon and State Department.
Some Republicans, such as Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), a close ally of the president who has been urging him to back Israeli strikes, are rejecting the idea of negotiations outright. “I think the idea of having a verifiable agreement with Iran is impossible. I think they’re liars,” Graham told JI. “I think they’re religious Nazis. I think they want a nuclear weapon, and the sooner we can get them out of the nuclear business, the better. It’d be like dealing with Hitler. There is no deal that’s verifiable.”
But other GOP senators are more open to tough diplomacy. “I’m very comfortable that the goal is going to be that Iran does not get a nuclear weapon, they’re going to be held accountable. That Hamas is going to be destroyed, and we’re going to support Israel,” Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) told JI.
Sen. Bill Hagerty (R-TN) told JI that Trump “wants to … make certain that Iran never has a nuclear weapon. I’m clear on that. I haven’t seen the specifics of what he said, but I know from my conversations that’s a nonstarter.”
Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) said he’d support a deal if it permanently ends Iran’s nuclear ambitions. “It depends on what the deal is,” Kennedy told JI. “If Iran gives up all its nuclear weapons and its capability of making more, then I’m interested.”
Democrats who’ve backed nuclear talks in the past said they’d be supportive of efforts to reach a deal again. “In his first term, when he accomplished a few bold and positive things like the Abraham Accords and [the trade deal with Mexico and Canada], I was supportive. I do not reject out of hand everything he proposes,” one Democratic senator said, adding that they were not surprised that Trump is pursuing a deal.
Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) said he was skeptical that Iran would trust Trump to make a deal after he pulled out of the original Iran deal, but “if he wants to have a dialogue about that, I would applaud that.”
ON THE HILL
Some Senate Republicans cautiously warm to Trump’s calls for a Gaza takeover

Some Senate Republicans are expressing cautious interest in President Donald Trump’s plan for the U.S. to “take over” Gaza — at least as a negotiating gambit — after an initial wave of confusion and opposition. But some Republicans remain stridently opposed to the proposal and most oppose Trump’s calls for U.S. military intervention, Jewish Insider’s Marc Rod and Emily Jacobs report.
What they’re saying: Some senators framed Trump’s proposal as a tool to reshape discussion and thinking in the Middle East about the path forward for Gaza. “He’s looking outside the box. He’s a real estate developer. He gets the value of it, and if he can tell other people that there’s a value in it, maybe they’ll think twice about trying to have Hamas as their spokesperson,” Sen. Mike Rounds (R-SD) told reporters. But Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said, “I’ve been on the phone with [Arab leaders] all day. That approach, I think, will be very problematic … So I would suggest we go back to what we’ve been trying to do: destroy Hamas and find a way for the Arab world to take over Gaza and the West Bank in a fashion that would lead to a Palestinian state that Israel could live with.”
Read the full story here for additional comments from Sens. Ted Cruz (R-TX), Kevin Cramer (R-ND), John Kennedy (R-LA) and Chris Murphy (D-CT).
Whose line is it anyway: Trump’s son-in-law and former senior advisor Jared Kushner suggested relocating Gaza’s population and remarked on the real estate potential of its beachfront property nearly a year before the president publicized his proposal on Tuesday, Jewish Insider’s Lahav Harkov reports.