Daily Kickoff
Good Wednesday morning.
In today’s Daily Kickoff, we report on how Senate Democrats intend to vote today on three pieces of legislation that would block some weapons transfers to Israel, and look at how Democrats’ ideological splits are dividing the party on the issue. We talk to Rep. Jake Auchincloss about how the incoming Trump administration could approach foreign policy and report on Israel’s confirmation that its air force struck an Iranian nuclear facility last month. Also in today’s Daily Kickoff: Sir Ronald Cohen, Sally Buzbee and Al Schwimmer.
What We’re Watching
- Apollo Global Management CEO Marc Rowan, who has emerged as a top candidate for Treasury secretary, is scheduled to meet with President-elect Donald Trump today at Mar-a-Lago. Rowan, who also serves as chair of UJA-Federation of New York, is reported to have flown back early from a trip to Hong Kong for the meeting.
- The House is slated to vote on a bipartisan resolution led by Rep. Kathy Manning (D-NC) promoting the adoption of the State Department’s global guidelines on antisemitism — which include adopting the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s working definition of antisemitism.
- White House senior envoy Amos Hochstein will arrive in Israel today following meetings in Beirut earlier this week aimed at ending the war between Israel and Hezbollah. Speaking yesterday in Lebanon, Hochstein said an end to the war was “within our grasp.”
- In Jerusalem, Opposition Leader Yair Lapid, former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, former Israeli security cabinet member Gadi Eisenkot and former National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror are slated to speak at the Israel Democracy Institute’s annual conference.
- XPANSE 2024 kicks off in Abu Dhabi today. Sir Ronald Cohen, MOV.AI’s Limor Schweitzer and Level Ex’s Sam Glassenberg are all slated to speak at the confab, which runs through Friday.
- Jewish Insider’s Gabby Deutch will be joining a panel of experts from the Brookings Institution, the University of Maryland and the American Constitution Society for a postelection look-ahead tonight at the Capital Jewish Museum in Washington.
- The U.N. Security Council is slated to vote this morning on a resolution calling for a cease-fire in Gaza, without conditioning it on the release of the hostages held by Hamas. American diplomats negotiated to soften the Algeria-led proposal with some success, removing the threat of enforcement and adding a call to free the hostages, but it still is not a necessary condition for the cease-fire in the latest draft. The Biden administration has vetoed similar resolutions in the past but has not publicly said how it will vote this time.
What You Should Know
The Biden White House’s decision to speak out against a push from progressive senators proposing legislation seeking to block aid to Israel is shaping up to be an early sign of postelection clashes between the party’s mainstream majority and its activist faction that will determine the future direction of the Democratic Party.
“We strongly oppose this resolution and we have made our position clear to interested senators,” a National Security Council spokesperson told Jewish Insider on Tuesday night.
News of the Biden administration’s involvement, first reported by The Times of Israel, is a seminal moment in the Democratic Party’s increasingly divisive internal debates over Israel and Middle East policy. It’s a sign that Biden is personally invested in ensuring that the party maintains its broadly pro-Israel posture, and doesn’t fall prey to far-left activists’ demands.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), along with several of Israel’s most frequent critics in the Senate, is pushing a series of anti-Israel resolutions that would block military aid, including guided bomb kits, tank shells and mortar rounds. Eleven senators voted for another long-shot measure by Sanders to censure Israel earlier this year.
The legislation has virtually no chance of passing, but the White House’s engagement suggests concern that a larger-than-expected bloc of senators would consider aligning with the party’s anti-Israel faction — an inconvenient development after a losing election where many Democratic leaders have blamed the the influence of left-wing activists for the party’s decisive defeat.
Mainstream Jewish and pro-Israel groups have been mounting a concerted advocacy campaign to pressure senators to oppose the resolutions because they see the measures as a barometer of where Senate Democrats stand on support for Israel nearly 14 months into its war against Hamas and Hezbollah.
The Jewish Federations of North America, the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, Democratic Majority for Israel and AIPAC are all urging supporters to lobby against the legislation.
The Jewish Democratic Council of America, the umbrella organization for Jewish Democrats, is also taking a strong stance against the measure — a sign that the group is drawing a line in the sand against the party’s anti-Israel faction. “This wasn’t a tough call for JDCA. We have always supported full funding of military assistance and opposed cuts or conditions on U.S. aid to Israel,” JDCA CEO Halie Soifer told JI. She said the group contacted every Democratic senator’s office to urge them to oppose the Sanders resolutions.
Seven senators, all vociferous Democratic critics of Israel’s military operations in Gaza, have said so far that they plan to vote for at least some of the resolutions. If the number of lawmakers supporting one or more remains around the 11 that supported Sanders’ January resolution, Jewish groups would likely see that as a victory. Seven have also said publicly that they’re likely to oppose all three resolutions, while another 18 said they’re undecided or declined to preview their votes. More below.
If closer to 20 Democrats support one or more of the resolutions, it would be a sign that skepticism of Israel has taken deeper root inside the Democratic conference, beyond the most vocal critics.
Biden’s involvement could mean that the number of Israel detractors will end up on the low end. But the fact that it’s taking White House involvement to prevent Democrats from repeating many of the same mistakes that dogged them in this year’s election is perhaps a wake-up-call to how challenging maintaining the party’s pro-Israel posture might be.
policy proposal
Auchincloss: U.S. needs to focus on splitting Iran and China, not Saudi normalization with Israel

The incoming Trump administration needs to focus its Middle East policy on disrupting and distancing ties between Iran and China, rather than “being obsessed” with normalization between Saudi Arabia and Israel, Rep. Jake Auchincloss (D-MA), a pro-Israel Democrat, told Jewish Insider’s Marc Rod in a lengthy interview last week on his proposal for Middle East policy in the coming years.
Saudi criticism: Auchincloss, who is Jewish, a military veteran and a member of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, also was sharply critical of Saudi Arabia as an unreliable partner being led by a “clown.” Saudi Arabia, Auchincloss argued, is still “animated by Wahhabi extremism” and, “in the long run… the Wahhabi strain of Islam is never going to be conducive with a strong alliance with Israel.”
Riyadh reckoning: The Massachusetts congressman emphasized multiple times that he is not opposed to bringing Saudi Arabia into the Abraham Accords — and that he would very much like to see the kingdom join the developing regional air-defense infrastructure — but is not comfortable with the demands that Saudi Arabia has put forward, including security guarantees and nuclear enrichment. “None of these things, to me, are worth it for a country that has not been a productive actor and I don’t think has any long-term compatibility with where we want this region to end up,” Auchincloss said, adding that he doesn’t oppose “good relations” with Saudi Arabia and that the country “does a lot of things that are useful. It’s just, let’s not let the pursuit of Saudi Arabia joining the Abraham Accords induce us to give up things that are not in our interests, or to potentially not prioritize things that would be much more impactful.”
Elsewhere: The Financial Times’ Andrew England reports on how some Arab diplomats are looking to Saudi Arabia to leverage its relationship with President-elect Donald Trump in an effort to temper the incoming administration’s strong support for Israel.