
Leaked and Loaded: Israel’s plans for Iran
Good Thursday morning.
In today’s Daily Kickoff, we report on President Donald Trump’s nixing of Israeli plans to attack Iranian nuclear facilities, and look at a possible matchup between Reps. Elise Stefanik and Mike Lawler in New York’s GOP gubernatorial primary. We also interview Jake Rakov, a former staffer for Rep. Brad Sherman who is challenging his one-time boss, and report on the Overseas Press Club’s decision to honor The Washington Post’s controversial Israel-Hamas war reporting. Also in today’s Daily Kickoff: John Ondrasik, Noa Argamani and Cobi Blumenfeld-Gantz.
What We’re Watching
- U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee arrives in Israel today. He’ll present his credentials to President Isaac Herzog on Monday in Jerusalem.
- Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni is meeting today with President Donald Trump at the White House.
- Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff are in Paris today for meetings with French President Emmanuel Macron and other European officials ahead of the resumption of Iran nuclear talks, which Witkoff is leading for the U.S.
What You Should Know
One of the most alarming aspects of left-wing identity politics is that it robs individuals of any agency, draining nuance out of any situation. People are either part of an oppressor or oppressed class. Institutions are condemned for not conforming to the political fads of the moment. Individuals are held responsible for the sins of their ancestors, even those without any connection to the country’s past.
As the late esteemed Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks put it in his 2007 book The Home We Build Together, such identitarian thinking empowers three toxic Gs: groupthink, guilt and grievance, Jewish Insider Editor-in-Chief Josh Kraushaar writes.
The excesses in identity politics can be seen clearly in the Trump administration’s efforts to expunge antisemitism from campuses through its deportations of anti-Israel foreign students and its threats to withhold billions of federal funds from elite colleges that fail to follow its prescriptions dealing with discrimination against Jewish students on campus.
The cause of combating antisemitism and support for terrorism on campuses is a noble one, and it’s a credit to the Trump administration that it has made it a priority. Universities have for too long tolerated and indulged anti-Israel activism that goes far beyond merely criticizing the Jewish state, and sometimes veers into the justification of terrorism or even outright support for American-designated terrorist groups, like Hamas and Hezbollah. Their inaction against Jewish discrimination — and the passivity from too many political leaders — led to this moment.
But the administration has also used the fight against antisemitism to pursue illiberal policies that go well beyond the worthy goals of combating discrimination on campus. The overreach has led even sympathetic conservative outlets like the Wall Street Journal editorial page and National Review to speak out against policies with which it might otherwise be sympathetic.
Part of the Trump administration’s challenge is rooted in its own version of identity politics — placing disfavored groups and individuals in the same category, no matter the specific details of the situations.
A Columbia University student, Mohsen Mahdawi, who was the apparent “ringleader” of threatening anti-Israel protests and who praised terrorist groups on multiple occasions, is treated the same way as Rumeysa Ozturk, a Tufts student on a student visa who is being detained for co-writing an op-ed critical of Israel in her student newspaper and didn’t even appear to be involved in anti-Israel protests.
The administration is on much firmer ground — legally and politically — deporting a key organizer of anti-Israel protests who has expressed sympathy for terrorist groups than someone simply expressing their anti-Israel views in an editorial.
The same lack of nuance is apparent in the administration’s aggressive moves against elite universities. The administration’s demands against Harvard, for instance, go well beyond fighting antisemitism and involve the government mandating a role in determining Harvard’s admissions and hiring policies. As the Wall Street Journal editorial Wednesday put it: “There are good reasons to oppose this unprecedented attempt by government to micromanage a private university.”
That overreach made it easy for Harvard to reject such demands, and mobilize a larger fight against any reforms — which could make it harder to accomplish the kind of constructive changes that were already taking place. When even some of the Harvard leaders on the front lines against antisemitism are raising concerns about the administration’s policies — from Rabbi David Wolpe to Hillel leader Jacob Miller — it’s going to be hard to maintain a united front when it’s badly needed.
Indeed, there seems to be a parallel fight taking place in the Trump administration between the antisemitism task force’s goals and a more influential set of officials who see the opportunity to go after higher education and foreign students, more broadly.
In his 2007 book, Sacks wrote about three I-words to counter the scourge of identitarianism that was just beginning to seep through the culture: individualism, ideas and improvement. Sacks’ wisdom should lead policymakers to incentivize those seeking to improve campus life through pluralism — the debate of good ideas — rather than nihilism in its burning the whole enterprise down altogether.
strikes scuttled
Trump rejected Israeli plan for striking Iranian nuclear program: report

Faced with fault lines inside his own administration over Iran policy, President Donald Trump rejected an Israeli plan, which would have required American backing and potential U.S. involvement, to strike Iran’s nuclear program as soon as May, The New York Times reported on Wednesday, Jewish Insider’s Marc Rod reports. Both the news itself and the leak are sparking concern in Washington.
Security concerns: Mark Dubowitz, the CEO of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, said that this leak could undermine efforts to forcefully negotiate with Iran. “There is no deal that permanently halts Iran’s nuclear weapons program without a credible military threat,” Dubowitz told JI. “It’s a serious error to signal — especially in outlets like The New York Times — that military plans may be off the table, even temporarily. Unless Iran’s leaders believe their regime is at risk, they will never agree to a deal that truly ends the nuclear threat.” Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-FL), a pro-Israel Democrat, blasted the Trump administration for rejecting the Israeli plan against Iran. “If Joe Biden had done this, Republicans would be outraged. Also this leak jeopardizes Israel’s security. There should be no deal with Iran until their nuclear program is gone,” Moskowitz said.
Related?: Three senior Pentagon officials — including two aides to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and the chief of staff to the DoD’s deputy defense secretary — were put on administrative leave on Tuesday and Wednesday during an investigation into possible leaks.