Daily Kickoff
Good Thursday morning.
In today’s Daily Kickoff, we cover Columbia University’s potential moves toward complying with Trump administration demands as the parties work toward a restoration of federal funding for the school, and look at an effort by the Dubai-based Augustus Media to push a boycott of the e-commerce platform Shopify over its president’s support for a call for unbiased reporting about Israel. We also interview the Brown Medicine official who hired a researcher now accused of supporting Hezbollah, and have the scoop on a call from dozens of House Democrats for Secretary of State Marco Rubio to fire State Department official Darren Beattie. Also in today’s Daily Kickoff: Ted Comet, Sonia Friedman and Jeremy Boreing.
What We’re Watching
- President Donald Trump is expected to sign an executive order this afternoon instructing Education Secretary Linda McMahon to “take all necessary steps” to begin shuttering the department.
- Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) wraps up his trip to Israel today. Yesterday, he met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem. More below.
What You Should Know
Shortly after Israeli airstrikes targeting senior Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad officials in the Gaza Strip began on Monday night, the messaging machine that is the Hamas-run Gaza Ministry of Health kicked into high gear, Jewish Insider Executive Editor Melissa Weiss reports.
Within hours, headlines emerged alleging that hundreds of people had been killed in the targeted strikes, most citing the Gaza Ministry of Health — many without caveating that the ministry is run by Hamas, and that it does not distinguish between civilians and combatants.
There were civilian casualties, to be sure. But the headlines and news reports earlier this week echoed the push notifications that emerged within minutes of an explosion near Gaza’s Al-Ahli hospital in October 2023 — alleging that Israeli airstrikes on the hospital had killed 500 people.
Of course, that was not true. For starters, it was a misfired PIJ rocket that had struck the hospital complex — and not even the hospital itself, but a parking lot. Nearly a year and a half later, there is no final answer as to the number of people killed, but it is widely believed that the true number falls far short of the 500 immediately announced by the Gaza Health Ministry and quickly reported by nearly every major news outlet.
The implications of the misreporting were serious — in the wake of the false reports, broadcast by everyone from CNN to The New York Times, Jordanian King Abdullah II nixed a trip to the Hashemite Kingdom by then-President Joe Biden that had been slated for that week. Far-left members of Congress pounced on the headlines, accusing Israel of deliberately targeting medical facilities. One member of Congress, Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI), still falsely blames Israel for the attack.
Why do news organizations repeatedly fall for the false, unverifiable statistics put out by Hamas?
There was no free press in Gaza before Oct. 7, 2023. But there also has not been one since — nearly all information that goes out of Gaza is filtered through Hamas. That’s why, in nearly a year and half of war, one might be hard-pressed to find Palestinian journalists in Gaza who have written articles unflattering to Hamas.
Israel, which restricts journalists’ access to Gaza to rare reporter embeds, does not make matters easier. The restrictions, which serve in part to protect Israeli troops whose movements could be given away, intentionally or unintentionally, by journalists on the ground, mean that most media outlets are reliant on Hamas-run ministries’ statistics, as well as reporting from stringers on the ground who are limited in their ability to report freely.
For months, Hamas-run ministries put out misinformation about the amount of aid entering Gaza. It took until spring 2024 — half a year into the war — for Israel’s COGAT to begin updating its website with the number of aid trucks entering the enclave each day, providing the only English-language statistics about the aid to counter Hamas’ false claims.
In the absence of a legitimate media presence in the Gaza Strip, content creators have filled the void, flooding TikTok and other social media platforms with “reporting” from Gaza that, at its worst, is intended to demonize the Jewish state in the public sphere. Some of these figures, whose social media profiles show them wearing “PRESS”-labeled flak jackets, have regularly praised senior Hamas and PIJ officials, even going so far as to post selfies with them.
Even the most venerated news outlets have fallen short. The Washington Post, which has faced numerous complaints over its coverage of the war, is now investigating old social media posts by an employee in the Post’s Cairo bureau who expressed solidarity “with the resistance as long as it is against the Zionist entity,” adding that she was “with Hamas and Hezbollah if their weapons are against Israel and not against Arabs like them.”
Axel Springer board member Martin Varsavsky earlier this week voiced his concerns with Politico’s publication of an Associated Press article that relied on Hamas statistics for its reporting.
Reporting in conflict zones is not for the faint of heart. It is grueling work that requires deep subject knowledge and an ability to discern between the truth and spin — something that many journalists covering the Israel-Hamas war lack. The power of the press is a privilege — one that Hamas has refigured into another weapon in its arsenal to attack Israel.
And as we saw with Al-Ahli, there can be real-world implications when journalists assume the talking points of a terrorist organization. It’s impossible to say how the trajectory of the war may have gone if Biden had continued on to Amman after visiting Israel in the first days after the Oct. 7 attacks.
But it’s not too late for journalists and media consumers to step back and objectively look at the information with which they are presented. That there was an immediate rush by news organizations earlier this week to accept the numbers put forward by Hamas underscores the degree to which the largely anti-Israel media narrative around the conflict has not changed in the 17 months since the war began.
classroom crackdown
Trump’s war on Columbia comes for Middle East studies

The field of modern Middle Eastern studies was born at Columbia University in the 1970s under the influence of Edward Said, the prominent Palestinian-American literature scholar and political activist. Now, the discipline as it currently exists may die there, too, as President Donald Trump seeks to rein in a field that has come under immense scrutiny following the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attacks. In a letter to Columbia’s president and trustees last week, the Trump administration issued a set of demands that it described as a precondition for beginning talks about Columbia’s “continued financial relationship with the United States government,” after $400 million in federal grants and contracts were pulled in response to Columbia’s alleged inaction against antisemitism, Jewish Insider’s Gabby Deutch reports.
Significant steps: The Wall Street Journalreported on Wednesday that Columbia was close to agreeing to meet Trump’s demands, which include banning masks, creating stronger campus disciplinary procedures, giving campus police more power and — most controversially, at least according to academics — putting the school’s Middle East, South Asian and African Studies department under something the Trump administration described as an “academic receivership.” Doing so would be an unusual step, with management of the department transferred from its faculty to an external figure. Receiverships are already extraordinarily rare within academia; to have one mandated by the federal government is unprecedented. The push to put the department under receivership has lit a fuse under academics, many of whom — including some who are deeply critical of the increasingly radical tilt of the Middle Eastern studies field — worry that the move reeks of government censorship.