The debate comes amid a yearslong campaign by the Trump administration to pressure universities to crack down on antisemitism — an effort that has included federal funding cuts affecting dozens of schools
Israel on Campus Coalition
From left: Jonathan Rauch, Noah Pollak and moderator Aviva Klompas at the Israel on Campus Coalition's National Leadership Summit on Monday, Aug. 3, 2026.
A senior Trump administration official and a journalist clashed during a Monday debate over whether the White House’s crackdown on campus antisemitism protects or threatens America’s liberal norms.
The debate — sponsored by SAPIR and held at the Israel on Campus Coalition’s National Leadership Summit in Washington — featured Noah Pollak, a senior advisor at the Education Department, who argued that the controversial crackdown is good for the country, and Jonathan Rauch, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and contributing writer for The Atlantic, who made the counterargument.
Some of the college students in attendance shifted their views on whether the Trump administration’s crackdown is good for America. Voting was conducted through scanning a QR code. At the start, 69% of students agreed the crackdowns were good for America and 31% disagreed; by the end, 57% of participating students said the crackdowns were good, while 43% said they were not.
After the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas terror attacks in Israel, “university leaders chose not to enforce the rules for one group of people,” said Pollak. “As long as it was leftists and pro-Palestine people [leading protests], it was considered fine. I don’t want any special treatment for Jews or anyone … The problem is we have had a fundamental breach on the part of a lot of universities with the basic bargain that should govern how a university functions in the United States.”
“The situation was very dire so we felt our response had to be strong. The leadership of those schools have shown over and over again unwillingness to govern the institution they led,” said Pollak. “Those institutions are very intertwined with the federal government.”
The debate comes amid a yearslong campaign by the Trump administration to pressure universities to crack down on antisemitism — an effort that has included federal funding cuts affecting dozens of schools. Most of the Ivy League schools targeted by the government, including Columbia University, entered settlement negotiations with the administration last year, issuing reforms and paying millions of dollars to the government.
Federal judges have ruled that parts of the administration’s actions, including funding freezes, violated the First Amendment and federal law. However, schools have experienced much quieter semesters since the oversight began, though some attribute the calmer climate to fatigue from protesters and the Israel-Hamas war ending.
“Noah and I agree on the use of legitimate legal process by this or any administration to ensure that everyone’s civil rights are protected,” said Rauch. “Where we disagree is that the line has got to be due process. They must not go beyond that. It’s bad for Jews because we of all people know the importance of law. Second, it’s bad for America because a lawless country is first and foremost bad for Jews, but bad for everyone. Finally, I’m going to argue we Jews need to be very careful about running to the government for help, because it shows weakness … the government can never protect us from antisemitism, we must protect ourselves.”
Rauch argued that the Trump administration had crossed a line from oversight into overreach, and that while campus antisemitism is real, it has been overblown.
“It is dangerous to give this administration, or any administration, the leeway to decide that private sector institutions, like businesses, law firms and universities, are ‘out of control,’” he said. He asserted that universities, especially elite ones, have work to do to improve viewpoint diversity and get rid of “oppressive” diversity, equity and inclusion rules. But claims made by the government to describe the overall state of campuses are “a wild exaggeration,” he said.
“A lot of places are real problems, we found that out on Oct. 8. [But] most academics in most departments are still trying to do good research and it is still the case that America’s university system is the crown jewel of research in the entire world… it is advancing science at a rate that has never been seen before, and the federal government should not be used as a cajole to shut that down,” said Rauch.
“We have work to do but that work should be limited to working within the rule of law,” he continued. That includes allowing speech such as “globalize the intifada,” depending on the context, he added.
Pollak argued that the government did not overreach because if it had, there would be more significant changes on campuses following settlements.
“Other than the absence of tent encampments, most of these campuses are largely unchanged. Columbia remains largely undedicated to any substantive reforms. Their Middle East studies department is chock-full of Hamas supporters just like it was three or four years ago,” he said. “If it was true we were these big bullies dropping sledgehammers on these campuses, you would see big changes on these campuses.
Pollak lauded some “good policy reforms that will take time,” but he dismissed the notion “that we’ve set off nuclear bombs on campuses, campuses look just like they did several years ago.”
Pollak also asserted that the solution to campus antisemitism is “not speech regulation” in most cases, but “the restoration of basic liberal norms.”
“That is a bigger reform challenge that the schools themselves have to take when they consider hiring and admissions,” said Pollak. “One of the big problems with the protest climate on campus after Oct. 7 was the type of students that universities have [admitted]… far-left political activists so you had this disproportionate presence of those students.”
Addressing Harvard, the only school that chose to litigate the cuts instead of negotiating — and remains in litigation — “all Harvard needed to do to not have those grants threatened was bring itself in compliance with civil rights law,” said Pollak.
“Maintaining Harvard’s ability to continue to engage in racial discrimination, to continue allowing its radical faculty and students to harass Jews on campus, was so important to Harvard that they were willing to risk funding for cancer research in order to allow that stuff to continue. I was shocked at this,” he said.
Even after many elite universities agreed to the administration’s reforms and paid settlements, some Jewish students say that while protests have dissipated, a quieter pressure remains on campus — a lingering sense of exclusion.
The debate concluded asking what universities can do to address this.
Rauch said it’s up to student activists, including the ones in the room, to make the difference. “You guys are doing the work. The work of changing hearts and minds is the work of Jews on campus being visible, kind and outspoken. By forcing yourselves to be heard and telling our story of the Jewish people and what we stand for, you are the ones who can solve the problem.” Other than enforcing safety, he said universities can’t make the change.
Pollak said that while he appreciates that sentiment, he has a “darker view of what is going on on campuses.”
While the severity of campus antisemitism has eased — something Pollak attributes to the Trump administration — “the problem is that the system is basically rigged,” he said.
“As part of these negotiations with schools you have the opportunity to really go deep on the professors who are in different departments and administrators. The schools have made a choice. [Leaders] make a decision everyday about what kind of campus their school is going to look like, and they defer to radical faculty.”
“Where we are right now,” continued Pollak, “is at the culmination of decades of all of those small decisions, which have turned many of our campuses, especially the elite ones, into political monocultures that are incredibly radical.”
“That’s the true source of antisemitism on campus, you have intentional choices by schools to make political environments that are radical… students hear over and over again that Israel is evil, that Zionism is racist. Until the schools undergo serious reform in how they operate, the kind of people they hire, the kind of classes they teach, the kind of departments they have, this problem is not going to get better.”
Stevens highlighted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s criticisms of her earlier on Tuesday amid attacks by primary rival Abdul El-Sayed over AIPAC support
Andrew Roth/Sipa USA
Rep. Haley Stevens (D-MI) speaks at the Michigan Democratic Party Endorsement Convention in Detroit, Mich., on April 19, 2026.
Rep. Haley Stevens (D-MI) continued a war of words with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as she faced a barrage of attacks from her primary opponent, former public health official Abdul El-Sayed, at a debate on Tuesday in Michigan.
Netanyahu, in a CNN interview earlier on Tuesday, criticized Stevens for saying that his actions and government had made the Jewish community less safe and placed Jews in an “uncomfortable position.”
“It’s made her uncomfortable because she can’t stand up for the truth. She’s trying to, probably, excuse antisemitism,” Netanyahu said in response to a question from CNN host Dana Bash.
Asked about the war in Iran, Stevens criticized both President Donald Trump and Netanyahu.
“We need long-term peace. Donald Trump has failed us. The prime minister of Israel has failed in that regard, and he was just coming after me on this today,” Stevens said. “Look, I am unafraid. Michigan, you are my North Star, and no illegal wars, no unilateral wars at our expense.”
She doubled down on those criticisms later in the debate.
“It is very clear that Mr. Netanyahu has not made us safer, has not brought us closer to peace, and he’s endangered Jews here in America and around the world,” Stevens said. “This is why he was just trashing me today on CNN. I am not afraid of bullies. I am not afraid to stand up, and I continue to stand up for humanitarian aid, for the U.S. to work with the countries in the region and get aid into Gaza.”
She also highlighted her work with the families of Israeli hostages formerly held in Gaza.
Stevens accused El-Sayed of opposing a two-state solution, alluding to his repeated refusal to say directly whether he believes Israel has a right to exist.
“The difference between my opponent and myself on this issue is that I believe in a two-state solution,” Stevens said. “I can say that Israel has a right to peacefully exist alongside the people of Palestine and in Gaza.”
El-Sayed argued that Netanyahu and AIPAC’s support for U.S. politicians are the primary reasons the U.S. entered the war, and emphasized that an AIPAC-linked super PAC has been attacking him and supporting Stevens.
“So long as our politicians continue to be bought off by AIPAC, do not be surprised when we fight wars that are in their best interest to … annex Lebanon or to do genocide in Gaza,” he continued.
He also argued that U.S. support for Israel, which he described as a “rogue state,” has foreclosed the possibility of a two-state solution, calling for an end to U.S. aid to Israel and “blank checks” to other Middle Eastern countries including Egypt and Saudi Arabia.
In response to repeated attacks over her support from AIPAC, Stevens pivoted to discussing other issues including her record in Michigan, GOP support for El-Sayed’s campaign and El-Sayed’s failure to release his tax returns, among other issues.
Responding to multiple questions from viewers and the debate moderator about the leftward shift of the Democratic Party, both candidates largely sidestepped the issue, though El-Sayed suggested he’s supportive of a shift in the party.
“I’ll tell you this: it won’t shift if we continue to elect leaders who take money from the same corporations who have broken with the interests of the American public,” El-Sayed said. “[Senate Minority Leader] Chuck Schumer (D-NY) desperately wants one of us to be the next senator, and it’s not me. So, if you want your politics dictated by AIPAC or Chuck Schumer, then I’m not your guy.”
Stevens, meanwhile, emphasized her record in office as a “workhorse” for the state. “This has always been about Michigan,” she said, when asked whether the race was a battle over the future direction of the Democratic Party.
El-Sayed ultimately offered a similar answer, saying, “I’m not doing this because of some direction of a party. I’m doing this because of the Michiganders that I’ve gotten to see.”
Plus, primary day in Washington, D.C.
Aaron Schwartz/Sipa/Bloomberg via Getty Images
President Donald Trump speaks during a maternal healthcare event in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, US, on Monday, May 11, 2026.
Good Tuesday morning.
In today’s Daily Kickoff, we look at how legislators and Jewish groups are responding to details surrounding the memorandum of understanding between the U.S. and Iran, and cover last night’s NY-10 debate between Rep. Dan Goldman and Brad Lander, where Israel and AIPAC again took center stage. We report on the influx of suspected GOP spending in the NY-17 Democratic primary as Cait Conley and Beth Davidson jockey for the chance to challenge Rep. Mike Lawler, and spotlight a new Meta initiative, announced by Ivanka Trump, to supply AI glasses to visually impaired veterans. Also in today’s Daily Kickoff: Eric Goldstein, Boris Epshteyn and Joel Scanlon.
Today’s Daily Kickoff was curated by JI Executive Editor Melissa Weiss and Israel Editor Tamara Zieve, with an assist from Marc Rod. Have a tip? Email us here.
What We’re Watching
- Members of the G7, including President Donald Trump, are in Évian-les-Bains, France, for a multiday summit. Trump is scheduled to meet today with United Arab Emirates President Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, and met earlier today with Qatari Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani on the sidelines of the summit.
- Speaking to media alongside the Qatari emir after their meeting, Trump said about the war with Iran, “Working with Qatar and the people of Qatar was really a pleasure — they were tough, they were strong, they are closest to Iran physically so … you were in a more dangerous position but I do have to say you fought and you helped us and with great bravery so I just want to compliment you on that and you will always be my friend.” Trump also noted that Qatar would be investing “much more than a trillion dollars” in the U.S.
- Vice President JD Vance, whose newest book, Communion: Finding My Way Back to Faith, comes out today, is slated to be interviewed this afternoon by Megyn Kelly.
- Vance’s appearance on “The Megyn Kelly Show” comes amid growing calls from Capitol Hill and beyond for the U.S. to make public the text of the memorandum of understanding with Iran, after Vance and Trump gave conflicting timelines for its release — and as Iranian-affiliated media outlets publish details they claim are part of the agreement. Trump said yesterday in Paris that the text would be released after a signing ceremony on Friday in Switzerland, while a senior U.S. official told journalists on Monday that the text would be released within 24-48 hours.
- Voters in Washington, D.C., head to the polls today to cast ballots in the city’s mayoral primary, where D.C. Councilmember Janeese Lewis George, who repeatedly clashed with the city’s Jewish community over her ties to the Democratic Socialists of America and comments about Israel, faces former D.C. Councilmember Kenyan McDuffie. More below.
- In Georgia, Republicans will vote today in the runoff to select the party’s candidate to challenge Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-GA) in November. The race will pit Rep. Mike Collins (R-GA), who is endorsed by Trump and has faced a series of controversies related to antisemitism and conspiracy theorists while in office, against Derek Dooley, the favored candidate of the state’s GOP governor, Brian Kemp. Read more about the race here.
- The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence is holding a closed briefing this afternoon.
- The Sami Rohr Jewish Literary Institute will announce the winner of the annual Sami Rohr Prize today. This year’s finalists are Laura Hobson Faure, Shaul Kelner, Jordan Salama and Amir Tibon.
What You Should Know
A QUICK WORD WITH JI’S GABBY DEUTCH
Today’s mayoral primary in Washington, D.C., has not gotten the same kind of frenzied national attention that accompanied recent mayoral contests in New York City, which pitted Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist, against a centrist Democrat, and in Los Angeles, where Republican Spencer Pratt made an insurgent bid against Mayor Karen Bass and Nithya Raman, a Democrat Socialists of America-affiliated councilmember.
Still, there are dynamics with some similarities to the race in Washington, where DSA member Janeese Lewis George, a District councilmember, faces Kenyan McDuffie, a former councilmember running a more moderate campaign. And, like in New York, divisions over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict have surfaced in a way that would once have been unexpected in a municipal election, at least before the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attacks in Israel and the ensuing war in Gaza.
Early this year, Lewis George sparked concern among some Jewish Washingtonians when she said in a DSA questionnaire that she would not attend events that “promot[e] Zionism” and that she would avoid engaging with “the Israeli government or Zionist lobby groups.”
She has since done a degree of damage control — meeting privately with rabbis and pledging at a Jewish candidate forum last month not to exclude people “based on your opinions or feelings on matters here and across the world,” even as she avoided answering a question asking her to clarify her views on Zionism. In March, she said it is not a conflict to support “Palestinian human rights” and to “stand firm in my commitment against antisemitism.”
McDuffie saw an opening with the DSA endorsement kerfuffle, particularly when talking to Jewish voters, a constituency he has sought to engage. He told Jewish Insider in April that he would not seek the endorsement of DSA or any organization “that requires some sort of divisive pledge to exclude people that are a part of the fabric of the community.” And he has opted not to weigh in on questions about Israel at all, saying it is not the role of a mayor to conduct foreign policy.
But zoom out, and the candidates’ approaches to Israel and Jewish communal issues were not front and center in the closing days of this race. The campaign has otherwise zeroed in on cost-of-living concerns and a dispute over who will better be able to counter President Donald Trump.
SCOOP
Trump administration officials tout Iran deal, say ‘hardliners’ are spreading misinformation

Top Trump administration officials shared new details on Monday about the memorandum of understanding reached by the U.S. and Iran over the weekend, arguing that the new agreement is substantially better than the 2015 Iran nuclear deal and could pave the way for a new relationship between Washington and Tehran, Jewish Insider’s Matthew Shea reports.
VP remarks: During an interview with CNBC, Vice President JD Vance said, “What this agreement does is say to the Iranians that ‘You don’t have access to the money to rebuild that nuclear program, but if you’re willing to give up that program long-term, if you’re willing to accept the inspections and verification regime that’s necessary to give us the confidence you’re never going to have a nuclear weapon, then we want you to be a prosperous country, and we will re-invite you into the community of nations.’”
Congressional review: Several Republican senators said that the administration does not need to submit the recently signed 60-day memorandum of understanding with Iran to Congress for review and a potential vote under the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act, potentially sidestepping the first major opportunity for Congress to weigh in on the agreement, JI’s Marc Rod and Emily Jacobs report.














































































Continue with Google
Continue with Apple