Daily Kickoff
Good Friday morning, and g’mar chatima tova to those observing Yom Kippur starting this evening.
In today’s Daily Kickoff, we look at Beijing’s recent shift in tone on issues related to Israel and cover last night’s Maryland Senate debate between Angela Alsobrooks and Larry Hogan. We talk to Rep. Dan Goldman about Democrats’ Jewish outreach in swing states and report on former President Donald Trump’s new ad targeting Americans in Israel. Also in today’s Daily Kickoff: Robert Kraft, Deni Avdija and Jessica Tisch.
For less-distracted reading over the weekend, browse this week’s edition of The Weekly Print, a curated print-friendly PDF featuring a selection of recent Jewish Insider and eJewishPhilanthropy stories, including: With a new $220,000 grant, Israeli researchers look to teach rabbis the latest science of forgiveness; ‘You are not alone’: Biden delivers final High Holidays greeting as president; Gov. Glenn Youngkin discusses his work fighting antisemitism in Virginia. Print the latest edition here.
What We’re Watching
- Vice President Kamala Harris is holding a High Holiday campaign call with Jewish voters at 1:30 p.m. ET.
- Russian President Vladimir Putin and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian are meeting today in Turkmenistan.
What You Should Know
As the November election approaches, several prominent Democrats have quietly begun to sound a tougher note against Iran and even speak out more clearly against anti-Israel voices within the party, Jewish Insider Editor-in-Chief Josh Kraushaar writes.
The more muscular rhetoric, from Vice President Kamala Harris down to high-profile congressional Democrats in competitive races, is another piece of evidence that underscores that showcasing support for Israel as it defends itself from Iranian attacks is a winning political issue.
The most notable note of Democratic hawkishnesscame from Harris in her most high-profile presidential campaign interview. On “60 Minutes,” Harris named Iran as the greatest adversary of the United States. “What we need to do to ensure that Iran never achieves the ability to be a nuclear power — that is one of my highest priorities,” Harris told CBS News correspondent Bill Whitaker.
That’s similar to the argument Israeli leaders have advanced, as they consider targeting Iran’s nuclear program in response to Iran’s ballistic missile attack against the Jewish state last week. President Joe Biden, meanwhile, has cautioned Israel not to target Iran’s nuclear or energy sites.
Another notable Democratic quote that caught our eye came from Michigan, the state where some pundits have suggested that Democrats need to pander to the faction of anti-Israel voters to win the state. But in the most high-profile debate in the state’s Senate race, Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) instead portrayed herself as a stalwart supporter of Israel and an Iran hawk.
“I take a back seat to no one on the issue of Iran. I’m as hawkish as anyone,” Slotkin said. “They’ve been our adversary for 50 years. We need to pressure them, to deter them, to contain them.” When asked by the moderator if she would have any “red lines” against Israel’s behavior, she didn’t speak out against a robust Israeli military response against Iran.
One Democratic strategist who has been polling Michigan told JI: “One percent of the Michigan electorate is Muslim. To watch the media talk, you’d think it was 30%. Jews comprise 2% of the Michigan electorate. Both are very small numbers — but one is twice as large as the others. And the pro-Israel community includes many people who aren’t Jewish.”
In Pennsylvania’s pivotal Senate race, another small shift in the Democrats’ approach came from Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA), who has been a reliably pro-Israel ally but has hesitated to speak out against a handful of anti-Israel lawmakers in his party, including Rep. Summer Lee (D-PA).
That changed this week after Lee and two other prominent Pittsburgh Democrats (Mayor Ed Gainey and Allegheny County Executive Sara Innamorato) released an Oct. 7 statement that equivocated over the terror attack while blaming Israel for the massacre as well as a widening war in the Middle East.
Casey spoke out against the statement on social media the following day, and later rebuked Lee by name in an appearance with Pittsburgh-area Jewish leaders on Wednesday. “It was especially insensitive, inappropriate, because of when they issued the statement, and I categorically condemn that statement.”
In nearby suburban Pittsburgh, Rep. Chris Deluzio (D-PA), facing a competitive reelection, told Semafor “[it’s not] realistic to ask the Israelis to take no action in the face of a now multifront war and the Iranians themselves lobbing missiles at them.” In May, Deluzio signed onto a progressive letter suggesting military aid should be withheld in response to Israel’s operations in Gaza.
These are all small rhetorical shifts in a direction more supportive of Israel and against anti-Israel lawmakers — which is significant in the face of far-left calls for Harris and other Democrats to pull their support of Israel in this precarious moment for the Jewish state. It follows an election season where two of the most radical anti-Israel lawmakers were defeated in Democratic primaries.
One time-tested political maxim is that actions speak as loudly as polls. It’s not a coincidence that Democrats in competitive races are sounding more supportive of Israel, as Election Day looms. It’s the clearest sign of the widespread backing of Israel in the American electorate.
beijing watch
Is a shift in China’s rhetoric on Israel a policy change, or ‘wishful thinking?’

A recent, slight shift in the Chinese Communist Party’s rhetoric has Beijing watchers in Israel wondering if the IDF’s successes in Lebanon are impacting China’s policies. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning commented on the anniversary of the Oct. 7 Hamas attacks on Israel in her press conference on Tuesday, saying that “the legitimate national rights of the Palestinian people need to be realized and the reasonable security concerns of Israel need to be paid attention to.” Before the Hamas attack, Jerusalem and Beijing seemed close, but in the weeks following Oct. 7, Israel-China relations took a sharp downturn. China did not condemn the massacre, refused to mention – let alone blame – Hamas, and accused Israel of going “beyond the scope of self-defense” even before it began its ground invasion of Gaza, Jewish Insider’s Lahav Harkov reports.
Deciphering her words: Now, Carice Witte, the executive director of SIGNAL — the Sino-Israel Global Network and Academic Leadership, told JI that Mao’s comments marked the first time China mentioned Israel’s “reasonable security concerns” in almost a year. Since Israeli operations detonating Hezbollah terrorists’ pagers and killing the Lebanese terrorist organization’s leader Hassan Hasrallah, Witte said, “China realized Israel might win and is therefore adjusting its stance, realizing that, in order to be in the Middle East, Beijing will need some level of decent relations with Israel.” But Joseph Rozen, the former director of Asia-Pacific at Israel’s National Security Council for over a decade and currently a senior fellow at the Misgav Institute for National Security and Zionist Policy, was skeptical that anything had changed with China, noting that Chinese officials used similar language soon after the Oct. 7 attack. “It’s a bit of wishful thinking to focus on this one nuance,” he said.