Daily Kickoff
Good Wednesday morning.
In today’s Daily Kickoff, we talk to former antisemitism envoy Deborah Lipstadt about the Trump administration’s approach to antisemitism in higher education, and look at New York Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani’s continued engagement with far-left anti-Israel figures as he mounts a bid for mayor of New York City. We also cover AIPAC’s ad campaign in states whose senators voted last week to restrict aid to Israel, and report on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s meeting in Washington with conservative podcasters. Also in today’s Daily Kickoff: Mira Resnick, Mike Huckabee and Dina Powell McCormick.
What We’re Watching
- The Senate is slated to vote today to confirm Mike Huckabee as U.S. ambassador to Israel. The Senate voted yesterday 53-46 to advance Huckabee’s nomination, with only Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) crossing the aisle to vote with Republicans to move the nomination forward.
- The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation will hold its confirmation hearing for Jared Isaacman, the Trump administration’s nominee to be NASA administrator. Read JI’s profile of Isaacman here.
- The House Homeland Security Committee is holding a markup of transnational repression and Syria legislation this morning.
- The American Jewish Committee is hosting its annual Ambassadors Seder tonight in Washington. Former hostage Keith Siegel, Israeli Ambassador to the U.S. Yechiel Leiter and Ukrainian Ambassador to the U.S. Oksana Markarova are slated to speak at the event.
- Former Harvard President Lawrence Summers will participate in a fireside chat with Sam Lessin this afternoon.
- An immigration judge in Louisiana set a deadline of this evening for the Trump administration to produce evidence in its deportation case against Mahmoud Khalil, the Columbia graduate whose green card was revoked by the government over his anti-Israel campus activism.
What You Should Know
One of the major themes we’ve been spotlighting and reporting on: The battles within the two political parties are as consequential these days as the battles between them, Jewish Insider Editor-in-Chief Josh Kraushaar writes.
With President Donald Trump back in the White House, it can be hard to identify the core principles of the Republican Party. Is it the party of free trade, free markets, traditional values and a muscular foreign policy? Or is it, in its new MAGA iteration, becoming a party of protectionism, restrictionism and isolationism?
Just over two months into the Trump administration, we’re already seeing some of the ideological fissures crack open. Free-market acolytes, like DOGE leader Elon Musk, are clashing with tariff devotees, such as Trump trade advisor Peter Navarro. Traditional conservatives who believe in using American power to protect our interests abroad — such as National Security Advisor Mike Waltz — are facing a rearguard action from an isolationist faction looking to disengage America from the world.
The internecine fights are getting ugly. On Tuesday, Musk called Navarro “dumber than a sack of bricks” after Navarro went on CNBC to suggest that Musk is opposing the tariffs because of his business interests. Far-right provocateur and 9/11 truther Laura Loomer secured a meeting with the president last week, after which Trump fired numerous experienced staffers on the National Security Council and at the National Security Agency.
Rank-and-file Republicans are trying to figure out where things will land in this volatile moment. Nearly all profess loyalty to the president, but some prominent GOP lawmakers have begun to raise pointed concerns about the impact of the tariffs. Trump’s decision to engage in talks with Iran this week over its nuclear program is another issue that will raise red flags among national security-minded Republicans.
Democrats are battling through a similar identity crisis. The party long associated with representing the interests of the working class has become a coalition focused on elite values. They’ve been slow to react to Trump’s overreach, in part because of their own vulnerabilities on immigration, crime, social justice activism and dealing with antisemitism. They’re trying to figure out how to placate a restive, progressive base while broadening their appeal with middle-of-the-road voters.
As we’ve noted, Trump’s self-inflicted economic challenges could paper over some of the party’s divisions, allowing them to simply run against Trump. But that doesn’t fully address the growing schism between progressives and pragmatists that is proceeding full steam ahead.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) has become the target of the left after he decided to support keeping the government open instead of using a funding bill as leverage to press the party’s opposition to the Trump agenda. Since then, a wave of restive lawmakers and new Democratic candidates have emerged slamming Schumer and calling for a new generation of leadership.
Needless to say, making the leading Democratic Jewish officeholder the boogeyman over an internal tactical fight within the party isn’t going to be the best way for Democrats to win back Jewish voters skeptical of the party’s ideological direction. And with voters starting to blame Trump over the shaky economy, Schumer’s decision to avoid a government shutdown is looking like a smarter decision by the day.
Battles between the left and center are taking place in key mayoral and Senate primaries across the country. Andrew Cuomo is facing a lineup of progressive opponents in this year’s New York City mayoral primary, and Democratic Senate primaries in Michigan and Minnesota are shaping up to feature a moderate and progressive standard-bearer. These intraparty battles will go a long way in determining which ideological direction the party will take.
In a time of growing polarization and extremism, it’s all too easy to get stuck in an ideological bubble far removed from mainstream public opinion. The party that manages to pivot to the center, and tune out the social media noise, will likely be the one best positioned for the political future.
WEIGHING IN
Lipstadt says Trump admin ‘weaponized’ antisemitism in higher ed policy

Two weeks after President Donald Trump was elected to a second term in November, Ambassador Deborah Lipstadt — then the U.S. special envoy to monitor and combat antisemitism — said she believed the Trump administration would take antisemitism seriously. Now, in her first public comments about Trump’s recent actions to address the rise of antisemitism on college campuses, Lipstadt is raising concerns about the way the president is tackling the issue. “I think it’s been weaponized,” she told Jewish Insider’s Gabby Deutch in an interview on Monday. “I think they [the administration] take it seriously. But I think the approach has not been as productive as it should be.”
Making martyrs: Lipstadt described herself as being “a schizophrenic person in the middle” in her assessment of Trump’s approach to antisemitism at American colleges and universities. She called the recent actions taken by Columbia University in response to demands from the White House “important steps,” ideas that Jewish students had first raised to indifferent administrators a year ago — with little progress until Trump stepped in to pressure Columbia. “I think that a lot of the issues that the Trump administration are addressing are serious issues, and some of the people they are targeting have done wrong things, bad things, potentially illegal things, or at least broken campus rules,” Lipstadt said. “I have concerns because I think that the impact in certain cases has been to make people who don’t deserve to be look like martyrs.”