Daily Kickoff
Good Friday morning.
Ed. note: The next Daily Kickoff will arrive on Tuesday, Jan. 16, in observance of Martin Luther King Jr. Day. Enjoy the long weekend!
In today’s Daily Kickoff, we look at how legislators on Capitol Hill are responding to the U.S.-led strikes on Houthi facilities in Yemen, and do a deep dive into Sen. Chris Van Hollen’s emergence as a leading progressive voice critical of Israeli policy. Also in today’s Daily Kickoff: Deborah Lipstadt, Michèle Taylor and Doug Emhoff.
For less-distracted reading over the weekend, browse this week’s edition of The Weekly Print, a curated print-friendly PDF featuring a selection of recent Jewish Insider, eJewishPhilanthropy and The Circuit stories, including: Amos Hochstein, Biden’s go-anywhere, get-things-done guy, faces his toughest deal yet; How the Israel-Hamas war upended online dating; U.S. ambassador to Lebanon acknowledged Israeli sovereignty over Golan. Print the latest edition here.
Social media isn’t real life.
That’s an important reminder to all of us on our screens 24/7, but is often easy to forget when reporting about politics, and watching the spasm of disruptive anti-Israel protests in several major cities, Jewish Insider Editor-in-Chief Josh Kraushaar writes.
One of the leading Democrats who understood that most Democratic voters aren’t representative of the online, progressive left is Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA). He has emerged as one of the most stalwart supporters of the Jewish state, while also criticizing other excesses of his party’s left-wing activists.
A new Quinnipiac poll underscores that siding with the Democratic mainstream on Israel is a winning strategy — at least in Pennsylvania, one of the most important battleground states on the political map.
Since speaking out forcefully for Israel since its war against Hamas, Fetterman’s job approval has spiked in Quinnipiac’s polling. In October, before the Hamas terror attacks, Fetterman’s job approval stood at just 41%, with 48% disapproving. Since he’s taken on the hard left, his approval jumped to 45%, with 42% disapproving.
Among Democrats, his support is sky-high. Only 7% of Pennsylvania Democrats view him unfavorably, while 76% view him positively. The former staffers writing anonymous letters urging him to take a tougher line on Israel and protesting outside of his offices are well out of step with Democratic public opinion.
Indeed, by a 2-to-1 margin (26-12%), more Pennsylvania voters say they’re more likely to think favorably of Fetterman for his pro-Israel stance than they are to think less favorably. By a smaller margin (20-16%), more Democrats are drawn to Fetterman for his pro-Israel advocacy than are dissuaded.
Overall, a plurality of Pennsylvania voters both approve of the way Israel is conducting itself in responding to the Oct. 7 terror attack (42-38%), and support the U.S. sending additional military aid to Israel as it fights Hamas (48-42%). On the latter question, Democrats are evenly divided (45-45%).
President Joe Biden is also seeing a small rebound in his political standing, though he’s still facing underwater approval ratings (40% approval). The Quinnipiac poll finds him leading former President Donald Trump for the first time in months (49-46%), and has won back some of the skeptical younger voters in a potential head-to-head 2024 matchup. It’s a sign that, despite the progressive dissatisfaction with Biden, many are likely to vote for him in a race against Trump.
As we’ve noted previously, the softest support for Israel is among the youngest voters. That’s a challenge that Democrats — along with the pro-Israel community — are focused on. But loud factions don’t come close to a majority. And that’s a political reality that Biden, Fetterman and many Democrats on a 2024 ballot have come to appreciate.
And in New York,former Rep. Nita Lowey (D-NY), a pro-Israel stalwart who served in Congress for more than three decades, announced her endorsement of Westchester County Executive George Latimer, a veteran Democrat challenging Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) in New York’s 16th Congressional District. “I have known and admired George for 35 years,” Lowey, who previously represented Westchester County, said in an exclusive statement shared with JI on Thursday. “He has dedicated his life to public service. He has made life better for everyone from Yonkers to Rye, Mamaroneck to Mt. Vernon, and Greenburgh to New Rochelle.”
striking support
Lawmakers rally behind U.S., U.K. strikes on Houthis in Yemen

Top lawmakers on both sides of the aisle largely expressed agreement that the U.S. was right to launch strikes on Houthi targets inside Yemen on Thursday evening, in response to weeks of attacks by the Iran-backed militia group on ships in the Red Sea, despite some divides in lawmakers’ hopes for the path forward, Jewish Insider’s Marc Rod reports.
From the left: “I salute the brave military members who carried out today’s strikes, and I support President Biden’s strong actions against the Houthi militants,” Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Jack Reed (D-RI) said in a statement. “The Houthis are endangering innocent civilians and launching violent attacks at U.S. personnel.” Reed and other top Democrats, including House Foreign Affairs Committee Ranking Member Greg Meeks (D-NY), also highlighted the importance of continued diplomacy ahead of and in the wake of Thursday’s strikes.
On the right: Republicans described the strikes, which also included U.K. support and had the backing of Australia, Bahrain, Canada and the Netherlands, as overdue and likely insufficient on their own. “I welcome the U.S. and coalition operations against the Iran-backed Houthi terrorists responsible for violently disrupting international commerce in the Red Sea and attacking American vessels,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said in a statement. “President Biden’s decision to use military force against these Iranian proxies is overdue.” McConnell said the strikes should “mark an enduring shift in the Biden Administration’s approach to Iran and its proxies” to show Iranian leaders “that they will pay a meaningful price unless they abandon their worldwide campaign of terror.”
The fringes: Meanwhile, Biden faced some pushback from progressive and hard-right lawmakers, who claimed that the strikes went beyond constitutional presidential war powers and were illegal without congressional authorization. Those allegations appear unlikely to hold water.
View from Riyadh: Saudi Arabia, which has reportedly been reluctant to support stronger action against the Houthis out of concern of disrupting its fragile truce with the group, distanced itself from the strikes in a statement, calling for “restraint and avoidance of escalation.”
The latest: The Houthis vowed retribution against the U.S.-led attack, with a spokesperson telling Al Jazeera, “It’s not possible for us not to respond to these operations.” Tehran blasted the strikes as an attack on Yemen’s sovereignty, while Iranian proxy Hezbollah said the strikes would strengthen the Houthis’ resolve.
Go deeper: Politicolooks at the lead-up to the Biden administration’s strikes on the Houthi facilities.