Daily Kickoff
Good Wednesday morning.
In today’s Daily Kickoff, we look at the challenges faced by Britain’s Labour party leader Keir Starmer amid increased pressure from anti-Israel forces within his party, and highlight Democratic candidates in a deep-blue Alabama House district courting AIPAC’s endorsement. Also in today’s Daily Kickoff: Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield, Ronen Tzur and Noah Kahan.
The Biden administration continues to offer mixed messaging as to how it views a potential Israeli invasion of Rafah, which Israeli leaders have described as imminent, reports Jewish Insider senior national correspondent Gabby Deutch.
The U.S. drafted a United Nations Security Council resolution stating that “under current circumstances, a major ground offensive into Rafah should not proceed,” according to a speech delivered by U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Linda Thomas-Greenfield on Tuesday.
The White House, meanwhile, is offering slightly different language that leaves room for a possible Israeli operation.
“We do not support operations in Rafah under the current circumstances without a credible plan to deal with the safety and security of the people there,” John Kirby, the White House national security spokesperson, said on Tuesday.
“We certainly support going after Hamas. We certainly support decapitating their network and eliminating the threat,” Kirby continued. “I did see comments by Prime Minister [Benjamin] Netanyahu that he ordered his military leaders to come up with such a plan.” But, Kirby added, he is “not aware” of any such plan having been completed.
The White House has similarly continued to resort to semanticson another key matter: whether the U.S. supports a cease-fire in the Israel-Hamas war.
The U.S. on Tuesday vetoed a separate U.N. Security Council resolution, authored by Algeria, that called for an “immediate cease-fire” in the Israel-Hamas war. Thomas-Greenfield said it could imperil talks to release the hostages, and the State Department’s top spokesperson explained that “an unconditional cease-fire only benefits Hamas.”
The competing resolution drafted by the U.S. calls for a “temporary cease-fire in Gaza as soon as practicable,” premised on the release of all hostages, according to Thomas-Greenfield.
The language doesn’t reflect a change in policy — the goal she described, of a negotiated deal that would pause fighting for up to six weeks if all hostages are released, has been the U.S. position for weeks — but it is the first time the White House used the term “cease-fire.” Previously, administration officials had opted for phrases like “humanitarian pause” or “cessation of hostilities.”
White House officials denied that the change in language was meaningful. “It reflects what we’ve been doing all along. It hasn’t changed what we’ve been doing,” said Thomas-Greenfield.
But it comes as the White House faces growing pressure from progressives to call for a cease-fire in Gaza. And while the White House’s stated policy aims remain unchanged, the new language offers a small, symbolic concession to those on the activist left for whom “cease-fire now” has become a rallying cry, even if such a term is increasingly meaningless.
labour’s love lost
Keir Starmer facing the ghost of Jeremy Corbyn within the Labour party

In the latest sign that the anti-Israel left in Britain is gaining momentum, Keir Starmer, leader of Britain’s Labour party, has called for a full and permanent cease-fire in Gaza, a policy turnaround for the politician widely seen as the country’s next prime minister. Speaking in Glasgow at Scottish Labour’s conference on Sunday, Starmer won lengthy applause when he called for the fighting to “stop now” and called for a “cease-fire that lasts.” The Labour leader’s speech, in which he also warned Israel against an assault on the southern Gaza city of Rafah, came just days ahead of a vote in the House of Commons, led by the Scottish National Party (SNP), for an immediate cease-fire. Members of the Scottish wing of the Labour party had also been backing such calls, Lianne Kolirin reports for Jewish Insider.
Fueled by fear? In the immediate aftermath of Hamas’ murderous attacks on Oct. 7, Starmer was unequivocal in his support for Israel. He received a standing ovation at the Labour party conference in Liverpool that same weekend, when he forcefully condemned the attacks. The following month he called for a “humanitarian pause,” and asked his party to abstain on a previous SNP motion to back a cease-fire. But the issue was proving divisive, leading 56 Labour MPs to rebel over the vote and prompting many resignations from front-bench politicians. Some political observers feel Starmer’s hardening position is, in part, fueled by fear of losing Muslim votes — particularly with a general election drawing closer.
‘Night and day’: Starmer became Labour party leader in 2020 after his predecessor, Jeremy Corbyn, lost in a landslide to former Prime Minister Boris Johnson. One of his key pledges on taking over was to rid the party of the antisemitism it had become associated with under Corbyn. “It’s ludicrous to suggest that — as [Prime Minister] Rishi Sunak and other Tories have — that the party hasn’t changed since Corbyn’s leadership,” Mike Katz, chairman of Jewish Labour Movement, told JI. “The difference is like night and day. Keir has shown a deep personal commitment on tackling antisemitism. Just last week marked a year since the EHRC took Labour out of special measures, following its unprecedented, damning report into Labour antisemitism.”