
Daily Kickoff: Israel’s diplomatic dilemma as attention turns to Rafah
Good Thursday morning.
In today’s Daily Kickoff, we look at the challenges facing Israel ahead of a looming military operation in Rafah, and report on yesterday’s House vote on condemning Hamas’ sexual violence. Also in today’s Daily Kickoff: Huma Abedin, Esther Safran Foer and Saad Hariri.
A new Fox News poll of Michigan voters shows that respondents support Israel over the Palestinians in the Gaza war by more than a 2-to-1 margin (53% to 25%), while Democratic voters in the state are split evenly between both sides, Jewish Insider Editor-in-Chief Josh Kraushaar writes.
The poll finds President Joe Biden narrowly trailing former President Donald Trump by two points in the crucial battleground state, 47%-45% — within the margin of error.
The results offer a corrective to the narrative that Biden needs to woo anti-Israel voters in order to prevail in the swing state. In reality, Biden is in something of a no-win situation: A plurality of his own voters side with Israel over the Palestinians (41%-35%), validating his broadly pro-Israel positioning.
But Biden loses over one-fifth of Democratic voters to Trump or third-party candidates on the general election ballot — in a sign of unrest on his left-wing flank. He also would lose one-quarter of African-American Michigan voters to Trump, according to the survey.
Back in Washington, and days after Trump professed his support for replacing foreign aid packages with loans, National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan offered sharp opposition to the idea in a Wednesday briefing with reporters. His comments came after Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), long a staunch foreign policy hawk, threw his support behind Trump’s controversial idea.
A loan, Sullivan said, would not help Palestinian families get medicine they need. Nor would it help Ukraine, “a country that is fighting for its life,” he added. “Talking about loans as opposed to providing the necessary infusion of cash is only going to make the economic problems of that country worse at a time we are trying to make them better.”
Look at Israel, Sullivan noted: “You have the funding for Israel in the supplemental, including money designed to ensure Israel’s security,” he said. “I would ask the question, is Donald Trump and is Lindsey Graham saying that we should only be providing that money on a loan basis, or that the memorandum of understanding, that has been supported on a bipartisan basis over the course of a decade, should be converted into a loan? I think you would probably find them taking a different approach on that question.”
In 2016, when the U.S. and Israel negotiated a 10-year MOU laying out the terms of U.S. security aid to Israel, Graham criticized Israeli leaders for agreeing to the deal — arguing they could’ve held out for even more money than the $38 billion committed in the plan. Graham’s team did not respond to a question on Monday about what his new position would mean for the MOU.
Rep. Mark Green (R-TN), the chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee and a third-term congressman, announced yesterday that he wouldn’t seek another term in office. He’s the fourth House committee chair to announce his retirement, joining Reps. Patrick McHenry (R-NC), Kay Granger (R-TX) and Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA), as well as Mike Gallagher (R-WI) — who chairs a select committee — joining numerous other Republicans heading for the exits.
Green, like Gallagher, was seen as an up-and-coming member of the Republican Conference, who just led the impeachment of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. The wave of retirements points to Republicans’ frustration with the gridlocked and dysfunctional House. Losing key senior members, and some of the party’s more pragmatic lawmakers, is likely to sap the party of leadership and policy expertise — making it all the more difficult for them to pursue serious legislation going forward, and potentially elevating the growing crowd of lawmakers more interested in political spectacle than governing.

final battle
Israel facing military, diplomatic dilemma as attention turns to Rafah

As Israel turns its attention to Gaza’s southernmost Hamas stronghold, Rafah, and what could be its final big battle in the war against the Islamist terror group, it faces a complex military challenge in a densely packed urban arena and a diplomatic pressure point as some of its closest allies call for restraint and even an immediate cease-fire. While four Hamas battalions are believed to be largely intact in Rafah and most of the Iranian-backed group’s senior leadership, including Oct. 7 mastermind Yahya Sinwar, is thought to be hiding there, the presence of more than 1.5 million civilians – many of whom fled fighting in the northern and central parts of the Strip over the last four months – sheltering in the area has drawn broad international concern, and mounting pressure on Israel to act with greater consideration for international law, Jewish Insider’s Ruth Marks Eglash reports.
Evacuation issue: “The key to winning the war is for Israel to take over Rafah, destroy the remaining Hamas battalions and take control of the Egyptian border,” Brig. Gen. (ret.) Amir Avivi, CEO of the Israel Defense and Security Forum, told JI this week. A former head of the army’s engineering corps who was responsible for the Gaza region, Avivi said there were ways for the army to move the civilian population out of danger as it battled the remaining Hamas fighters. He pointed to areas west and north of Rafah, where people could shelter, and said that with Khan Younis, which sits just to the north of Rafah, soon “cleared,” people could be directed there too. “There are places to move the people,” said Avivi. “It is far less complicated than people are saying.”
Military challenges: Eyal Pinko, a retired Navy commander who served in the Israeli navy and intelligence agency for 30 years, told JI that military maneuvers in Rafah would be extremely difficult due to the large civilian presence and the fact that Hamas fighters had now embedded themselves inside that population. “The challenges are different now and you can’t bombard Rafah from the air,” Pinko, now a senior research fellow at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, noted, highlighting the contrast to earlier battles in the northern and central regions of Gaza, where the civilian population was easily evacuated, and Hamas terrorists operated from its underground infrastructure. “I think Israel has a huge dilemma,” observed Pinko. “There was a declaration at the beginning of the war that the first goal was to bring back the hostages and the second goal was to take out Hamas – the problem is that these two goals are contradictive to one another.”
Bonus: The Wall Street Journal reports on the “exacerbated tensions” between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Joe Biden.