Daily Kickoff
Good Wednesday morning.
In today’s Daily Kickoff, we talk to Israeli MK Avigdor Liberman about his unheeded warnings of a Hamas attack, and report on National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan’s meeting with Senate Democrats over aid to Israel. Also in today’s Daily Kickoff: Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Dr. Miriam Adelson and Jeff Shell.
For several hours on Tuesday night, a tweet from President Joe Biden’s campaign account set observers of the Israel-Hamas war on high alert. The three sentences came from a speech Biden gave on Saturday about the hostage releases.
“Hamas unleashed a terrorist attack because they fear nothing more than Israelis and Palestinians living side by side in peace,” the tweet read. “To continue down the path of terror, violence, killing, and war is to give Hamas what they seek. We can’t do that.”
Read on their own, it was unclear to many whether Biden was outlining a policy shift — and whether he was, for the first time, embracing progressive activists’ calls for a cease-fire.
A senior journalist with the Middle East news publication Al-Monitor said Biden “essentially endorse[d] a cease-fire” with the tweet, arguing that he was “reject[ing] ‘path of war.’” One far-left activist called it a “major shift in tone.” More hawkish commentators who had previously cheered Biden’s approach to Israel wondered if they should reassess.
But a senior Biden administration official told Jewish Insider’s Gabby Deutch that the White House’s support for Israel and its military campaign against Hamas remains unwavering, and that “this is not a change in policy,” noting that it came from a longer speech.
“The president continues to strongly believe that Israel has every right to defend itself from an active terrorist threat. We have seen Hamas officials say publicly that they want to try to commit the atrocities of October 7 again and again,” the official said.
The quote in the tweet came from remarks Biden delivered last week after Hamas had released its first round of hostages in the ongoing, several-day humanitarian pause in fighting. The passage came at the end of a section reiterating Biden’s support for a two-state solution. The lines that were quoted in the tweet were “a reference to how Hamas does not want peace,” said the official, who also added that “Israel has every right to defend itself” also after the pause ends.
The senior official’s expression of support for Israel’s war against Hamas comes amid emerging disagreements between Washington and Jerusalem over Israel’s conduct in Gaza. Other top officials in the Biden administration have increasingly begun to warn Israel to consider reining in its potential operations in southern Gaza, cautioning that large-scale Israeli military activity in the south could cause a humanitarian disaster. Read more here.
The Biden administration’s approach to Israel is markedly different from how then-President Barack Obama reacted to Israeli moves during the 2014 Operation Protective Edge. NBC News highlighted Biden’s stronger support for Israel, noting that Obama took a harsh public line on Israeli actions in Gaza, while Biden has kept any disagreements behind the scenes in an effort to maintain some degree of influence in Jerusalem’s decision-making process.
The story also reports that “Biden’s confidence in his strategy has not wavered… If anything, it has hardened despite his administration’s recalibrated public message urging Israel to minimize civilian casualties.”
“If this was the Obama years, we would’ve been a lot more publicly critical than we have been by now,” a senior administration official told NBC News. “And that wouldn’t work. We wouldn’t have the influence.”
NBC News also reported that Obama’s recent comments on an episode of “Pod Save America” had ruffled feathers in the Biden administration, where staffers saw Obama’s remarks as undermining Biden’s position.
on the hill
Senate Democrats discuss Israel aid conditions with White House national security advisor

National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan met with Senate Democrats on Tuesday to discuss potential efforts, championed by progressives, to place conditions on U.S. emergency aid to Israel. Lawmakers indicated that the conversations had not reached a conclusion and would likely continue, Jewish Insider’s Marc Rod reports.
Back and forth: “Different people voiced different views on it,” Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), one of the leading champions of conditions, said. “I think what I’m happy about is we’re beginning to have some serious discussions, and obviously there are differences of opinion.” Sanders suggested yesterday he might try to force a vote on conditions.
More to come: Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said in a press conference that the meeting on Tuesday was the latest in a series of discussions around conditioning aid to Israel. “There are different views on that and we’re going to have to have a discussion with the caucus and the administration,” Schumer said. “But above all, we’ve got to pass the [emergency aid bill]. That’s the North Star.” Schumer didn’t specifically answer a question about his personal views on the subject, saying, “I’m going to discuss it with the administration and my caucus.” He said he’ll bring the emergency aid bill, which will also include Ukraine, Taiwan and humanitarian funding, up for a vote next week.
In opposition: Other Senate Democrats have explicitly ruled out supporting conditions. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), who attended a meeting with senior Israeli Defense Forces officials yesterday, said he thinks efforts to influence Israel to protect civilians have been successful. “One of the reasons why I have opposed detailed restrictions is I don’t think we should be putting into statute, in effect micromanaging, the use of arms by Israel when it’s fighting for its own existence against a terrorist organization committed to destroy and annihilate the Israeli people,” Blumenthal said.
Bonus: The House voted unanimously last night for a resolution condemning Hamas and calling for the immediate release of its hostages. It voted nearly unanimously for a resolution affirming Israel’s right to exist, with Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) voting no, and Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI), who supports a one-state solution, voting present. The resolution also describes denying Israel’s right to exist as antisemitic and describes Jews as native to Israel. Staunch far-left critics of Israel voted in favor of both of the resolutions, which are nonbinding. The two votes represented strikingly bipartisan support for Israel. After the votes, Tlaib released a statement that drew equivalences between Hamas hostages and Palestinians imprisoned by Israel. Massie said that “expanding [antisemitism] to include criticism of Israel is not helpful.”