Daily Kickoff
👋 Good Tuesday morning.
Ed. note: In observance of Yom Kippur, the next Daily Kickoff will arrive on Thursday.
In today’s Daily Kickoff, we look at an effort by several Jewish groups to encourage the Supreme Court to take up a case involving religious accommodations provided by employers. We also cover last night’s state treasurer debate in Arizona, in which the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement featured prominently. Also in today’s Daily Kickoff: Liel Leibovitz, Mahmoud Abbas and Liz Truss.
Twenty-eight Jewish and pro-Israel groups signed on to a letter condemning the recent decision by nine student organizations at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law to adopt a bylaw prohibiting invitations to pro-Israel speakers. Among the signatories are AIPAC, the American Jewish Committee, the Foundation to Combat Antisemitism, Hadassah, the Jewish National Fund and the Israel on Campus Coalition.
“The bylaw is a vicious attempt to marginalize and stigmatize the Jewish, Israeli, and pro-Israel community and to normalize the requirement that Zionist Jews hide or alter a fundamental aspect of their identity in order to be fully accepted in certain arenas,” the letter reads. “This is unabashed antisemitism.”
The bipartisan advocacy group Pro-Israel America will announce today that its political arm is prioritizing more than a dozen “key” House races in the lead-up to the midterms, according to a statement shared exclusively with Jewish Insider.
The list, which covers 13 competitive races, features a number of candidates who were backed by PIA during the primaries as well as a new endorsement for Rep. Michelle Steel (R-CA), who is seeking a second term in California’s redrawn 45th Congressional District. The other candidates include Reps. Don Bacon (R-NE), Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA), Jared Golden (D-ME), Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ), Young Kim (R-CA), Susie Lee (D-NV), Mike Levin (D-CA), Elaine Luria (D-VA), David Valadao (R-CA), Kathy Manning (D-NC), Chris Pappas (D-NH) and Dina Titus (D-NV).
“We are keeping a close eye on these 13 key race candidates, all of whom vary widely along the ideological and political spectrum but share a common goal of strengthening economic and security ties between the United States and Israel,” Jeff Mendelsohn, PIA’s executive director, told JI.
court report
Jewish groups urge Supreme Court to take up religious accommodations case

The U.S. Supreme Court building stands in Washington, D.C., on October 3, 2022.
Several Jewish advocacy groups are urging the Supreme Court to take up a case that could overturn decades-old precedent and significantly expand the scope of religious accommodations that employers are required to provide to their employees as the Court begins its new term, Jewish Insider’s Marc Rod reports.
Background: In Groff v. DeJoy, a former mail carrier from Pennsylvania is suing the U.S. Postal Service, which disciplined him and threatened to terminate him because he refused to work on Sundays. USPS attempted to fill some of his Sunday shifts, but was unable to fill all of them. The mail carrier, an evangelical Christian, quit his job, saying that his religious beliefs did not permit him to work on Sundays. Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, as amended in 1972, employers must accommodate their employees’ religious beliefs unless doing so causes an “undue hardship.” Soon after this provision was passed, the Supreme Court ruled in Trans World Airlines v. Hardison that employers are not required to grant accommodations that impose anything beyond a “de minimis cost” on the employer.
Long time coming: Jewish groups — particularly those representing Jews who strictly observe the Sabbath and Jewish holidays — have long sought to overturn the “de minimis cost test” established in the Hardison ruling. The National Jewish Commission on Law and Public Affairs (COLPA), Orthodox Union and The Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty (JCRL) have each filed briefs urging the high court to consider Groff v. DeJoy, with a range of Orthodox groups — including Agudath Israel of America — joining the COLPA brief.
Overturning: The Jewish groups argue that the Hardison ruling effectively invalidated the Title VII provisions. “That’s not what Congress intended… that was such a very big blow,” said Nathan Lewin, a constitutional lawyer who authored the COLPA brief, argued the original Hardison case as a “friend of the court” and was involved in drafting the Title VII language in question. Lewin emphasized that he “cannot overstate… the importance of this case” and that he regularly receives calls from Orthodox Jews who say they have been denied jobs or promotions because their employers have rejected accommodations for them. “I’ve seen lots of cases in which Orthodox Jewish individuals have, as we said in the brief, had their careers curtailed, have lost jobs because of Hardison,” he said.