Israel’s negotiators in hostage release and cease-fire talks are set to return to Doha, Qatar, on Thursday, against the backdrop of growing public divisions between senior Israeli officials.
Hamas has refused to participate in the upcoming round of negotiations, potentially dealing a fatal blow to the effort by the U.S., Egypt and Qatar.
Adding greater urgency to the talks is a statement from Iranian officials that such a deal would stop Tehran from retaliating against Israel for Hamas political bureau head Ismail Haniyeh’s assassination in Tehran two weeks ago. Asked about the matter on Tuesday, President Joe Biden said: “That’s my expectation.”
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu held a seven-hour series of three meetings on Wednesday before authorizing the makeup of the Israeli delegation and its mandate for the negotiations. Mossad head David Barnea, Shin Bet chief Ronen Bar, IDF representative to the talks Maj.-Gen. (res.) Nitzan Alon and the prime minister’s diplomatic adviser, Ophir Falk, will be representing Israel in Doha.
Hamas’ planned absence from the negotiations was the first public decision made by the terrorist group’s new political bureau leader, Yahya Sinwar, the Oct. 7 mastermind who added the title to his role as Hamas leader in Gaza after Haniyeh’s assassination. While Haniyeh was, ostensibly, in charge of negotiations on the Hamas side, Sinwar was believed to have the final word throughout.
State Department spokesperson Vedant Patel said on Tuesday that Washington has “seen the reports of what they have said as it relates to their participation.” However, he added, “Qatar has assured us that they will work to have Hamas represented there, and we fully expect these talks to move forward.”
“It is far time for Hamas to release the remaining hostages, including the American citizens,” Patel said.
Ahmad Abdul-Hani, a Hamas official in Lebanon, told The New York Times that Hamas will not take part in the negotiations, and blamed Netanyahu for “deceiving and evading and want[ing] to prolong the war and even expand it at the regional level.”
The talks also come amid greater media attention to Israel’s terms for a cease-fire deal, which, as previously reported by Jewish Insider, include continued Israeli control over the Philadelphi Corridor along the Gaza-Egypt border and the Netzarim Corridor across central Gaza to ensure that weapons and terrorists are not smuggled northward.
Netanyahu’s office took issue with the assertion that he made extensive new demands contradicting a May draft of the deal.
“The charge that … Netanyahu added new conditions to the May 27 proposal is false,” the Prime Minister’s Office stated on Tuesday. “Netanyahu’s July 27 letter does not introduce extra conditions and certainly does not contradict or undermine the May 27 proposal. In fact, Hamas is the one that demanded 29 changes,” which Netanyahu would not accept.
According to the PMO, the May 27 proposal already stipulated that terrorists and arms could not cross the Netzarim Corridor, and Israel asked on July 27 for details of how that would be enforced. In addition, the July 27 letter seeks to ensure that all living children, infirm or wounded hostages held by Hamas would be released in the early stage of the deal, while the earlier proposal said “living or dead.” Finally, the later letter emphasized that Israel would be able to veto a certain number of terrorists that Hamas demands be released in exchange for the hostages, which the PMO said was already included in the earlier proposal.
Not in the PMO statement is the argument that Israel is contradicting the May 27 proposal that pledged the “withdrawal of Israeli forces eastwards … along the borders in all areas of the Gaza strip,” because Israel seeks to remain along the Philadelphi Corridor. Israeli diplomatic sources have told JI that Jerusalem’s position is that the May 27 proposal did not address the Philadelphi Corridor because the IDF had not yet gained control over it at that time.
The Philadelphi Corridor is also the topic of increasingly public disputes among Israeli leaders.
Defense Minister Yoav Gallant criticized Netanyahu and his position in the hostage talks, telling lawmakers in a closed-door meeting of the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee on Monday that a hostage deal has been delayed “also because of Israel,” and arguing that “nothing will happen” if Israel temporarily withdraws from the Philadelphi Corridor.
IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Herzi Halevi visited the Philadelphi Corridor on Wednesday and told soldiers that the IDF is “preparing possibilities for anything the political level decides. If they decide that we are remaining on Philadelphi, we will know how to remain there and stay strong. If they will decide that we are monitoring and raiding every time we have an indication [of weapons being smuggled into Gaza], we will know how to do it. We will know how to work well.”
There have been reports and leaks for months that Netanyahu and the defense establishment are at odds over the hostage talks. The prime minister reportedly considered replacing Gallant, but, according to KAN, held off in order not to anger Washington.
Gideon Sa’ar, the former cabinet minister whose party left the unity government over Netanyahu’s management of the war, is thought to be one of the candidates the prime minister considered for defense minister, in order to bolster the coalition. On Thursday morning, Sa’ar criticized Gallant and Halevi for speaking publicly about the option of withdrawing from the Philadelphi Corridor, in opposition to Israel’s official position in the negotiations.
The security establishment is “damaging the positions presented in the negotiations with their public statements. This is simply foolish,” Sa’ar told Army Radio.
The dispute between Netanyahu and Gallant was laid bare on Monday.
Gallant deemed Netanyahu’s slogan “total victory” to be “nonsense.” When questioned, the defense minister added: “When it comes to defense, I know what I’m talking about.”
“We are at a fork in the road. There is the possibility of a deal that will bring an arrangement in the north” — for Hezbollah to stop its attacks — “and in the south, and another option is escalation to war. The security establishment and I support the first scenario. We know how to live with its price,” Gallant said.
The Prime Minister’s Office released a statement that “when Gallant adopts the anti-Israel narrative, he harms the chances of reaching a hostage release deal. He should have attacked Sinwar, who is refusing to send a delegation to the negotiations, who has been — and remains — the only obstacle to a hostage deal.”
The PMO reiterated that Israel seeks “total victory, which means eliminating Hamas’s military and governing capabilities, and releasing our hostages. This victory will be achieved.”
“This is the clear directive of Prime Minister Netanyahu and the Security Cabinet, and it obligates everyone — including Gallant,” the statement reads.
Likud MK Tali Gottliv, who argued with Gallant in the Knesset committee meeting, called for the defense minister to be fired.
Diaspora Affairs Minister Amichai Chikli posted on X on Wednesday that “any Israeli decision maker who is pushing to leave Philadelphi, including leaving ‘temporarily,’ and we all know there is nothing more permanent than [something meant to be] temporary, is serving Iran’s rescue plan for Hamas.”
Earlier this month, an Israeli official told JI that leaks about the hostage and cease-fire talks are meant “to pressure the prime minister to make a bad decision, but in essence, what they’re doing is encouraging Hamas to continue to refuse to make a deal. The worst thing is that they’re hurting the families. They should be ashamed of themselves.”