The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee voted 8-7 Thursday to advance Sen. Markwayne Mullin’s (R-OK) nomination to be secretary of homeland security to the full Senate, largely along party lines.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), the committee chair, was the lone Republican to oppose the nomination, while Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) voted in support. Mullin’s nomination now heads to the full Senate, where a simple majority is required for confirmation.

Prior to the vote, Sen. Gary Peters (D-MI), the committee’s ranking member, announced he would oppose the nomination, arguing that Mullin “is not up to the challenge.”

“When I heard President [Donald] Trump would be nominating Sen. Mullin, I kept an open mind,” Peters said on Thursday. “However, throughout the nomination process, he has failed to be forthright and transparent. Sen. Mullin also showed that he doesn’t have the experience or the temperament to lead this critical department.” 

Some committee members had expressed frustration during his hearing on Wednesday that Mullin was not forthcoming about a trip he took as a member of Congress, which he claims was classified.

Explaining his vote as the lone Democrat in support, Fetterman said on social media: “My AYE is rooted in a strong committed, constructive working relationship with Senator Mullin for our nation’s security.” He added that he had approached the confirmation “with an open-mind.”

During Mullin’s contentious hearing on Wednesday, Paul had voiced opposition to Mullin, citing personal animosity stemming from remarks the Oklahoma senator made about a past assault on Paul.

Mullin last month called Paul a “freaking snake” and said he “understood” why Paul’s neighbor had attacked him — an assault that left Paul with serious injuries and resulted in a prison sentence for the assailant. Mullin declined to apologize during the hearing, prompting Paul to threaten to cancel the vote.

The vote also comes as DHS enters the second month of a funding lapse amid a standoff between lawmakers over funding and reforms for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

The lapse has impacted agencies including the Transportation Security Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, ICE and the Coast Guard, raising security concerns amid heightened threats tied to the ongoing war with Iran.

During his confirmation hearing, Mullin said it was a “horrible time” for the department to be without full funding and acknowledged the increased threat environment.

Lawmakers also raised concerns about the Nonprofit Security Grant Program, which provides funding to help protect religious institutions.

Following last week’s violent attack at Temple Israel in suburban Detroit, Mullin was pressed on the need to streamline the program amid persistent challenges, including underfunding and delays tied in part to the DHS funding lapse.

Mullin agreed, saying “there’s a better way to do this,” adding that he would be “laser-focused” on improving the program.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) is delaying efforts to confirm former National Security Advisor Mike Waltz as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations over Waltz’s previous support for a continued U.S. troop presence in Afghanistan.

Paul told Jewish Insider on Wednesday he would not vote to support moving Waltz out of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee with a favorable recommendation, as is generally a standard part of the confirmation process. Paul’s concerns forced the committee to delay a vote, scheduled for Wednesday, to advance Waltz’s nomination.

Paul said he would vote to advance the nomination with a neutral recommendation, which would allow Waltz to move forward for consideration from the full Senate but would be an unusual black mark on Waltz’s nomination. Unless Waltz picks up Democratic support, the committee vote would be tied — preventing the nomination from moving forward — without Paul’s backing.

He explained to JI that his concerns about Waltz revolve around the former national security advisor’s previous support for an amendment in the House, led by former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY), that would have forced the first Trump administration to maintain a troop presence in Afghanistan unless Congress approved a full withdrawal.

“I think that has constitutional problems and really goes against a lot of things that people believe, that on initiation of war, I think the president should be limited and [Congress] initiate[s] war,” Paul said. “Once a war is executed, I don’t think Congress has any business telling President [Donald] Trump … ‘You can’t have less than 8,000 troops in Afghanistan.’”

“This was led by Liz Cheney. It was a terrible thing and very anti-Trump and so I didn’t like that,” Paul said.

He also made reference to other comments he said Waltz had made about a long-term U.S. presence in Iraq or Afghanistan, which Paul said he found unacceptable.

The Kentucky senator questioned Waltz about his support for the Cheney amendment during his confirmation hearing last week.

Senate Republicans could attempt to discharge Waltz’s nomination from the committee by a full vote of the Senate, but such a process would be time-consuming and has rarely succeeded.

Sen. Jim Risch (R-ID), the chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said during the committee’s meeting on Wednesday morning that a senator had requested the vote on Waltz be delayed until the committee’s next meeting, and placed the committee’s business meeting into recess “until further notice, as we consider Mr. Waltz further.”

The Senate has one week left in session before its monthlong August recess, though Trump has urged Senate leadership to cancel the break to continue processing nominations.

Sen. Pete Ricketts (R-NE) attempted to call up and pass by unanimous consent a resolution urging the United Kingdom, France and Germany to trigger the snapback of United Nations sanctions on Iran under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action “as soon as possible,” but was blocked by Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY).

“In order to seize this moment,” and capitalize on Iranian weakness, “the U.S. and our allies must impose maximum pressure to the highest extent possible to force Iran to agree to permanently and verifiably end its nuclear program, including its capacity to enrich,” Ricketts said on the Senate floor on Wednesday.

The option to invoke snapback is set to expire in mid-October, but Ricketts emphasized that the process will take at least 30 days to complete, and that Russia is set to assume the presidency of the U.N. Security Council in October, in which role it could delay the proceedings. European allies have reportedly set an August deadline to initiate snapback, but Ricketts argued that “timeline … leaves little room for error.”

“I stand to urge our European friends to hold the line” in upcoming talks with Iran, Ricketts said, warning that Iran is trying to buy time and delay snapback.

Paul warned that the U.S. attack on Iran might make Iran more resistant to U.S. demands and “may turn out to be a disaster” that prompts Iran to sprint to a nuclear weapon.

He argued that sanctions have never changed Iran’s behavior — a notion disputed by leaders on both sides of the aisle — and “are often counterproductive” in general. Paul also suggested that the U.S. is in no position to make any requests related to snapback since President Donald Trump removed the U.S. from the Iran nuclear deal in 2018.

“It is a bit inconsistent for us to be arguing that Europe should apply and adhere to the JCPOA, which we no longer participate in,” Paul said. “If the United States is no longer a member of the JCPOA, what gives Washington the right to advise those who remain in it to invoke certain mechanisms within the agreement?”

He requested the Ricketts resolution be modified to instead call for deescalation and diplomacy.

Ricketts responded that diplomacy without pressure is a failed concept.

Sen. Jim Risch (R-ID), the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, also spoke on the Senate floor in support of Ricketts’ resolution.

“Over the last 10 years, Iran has enjoyed unwarranted sanctions relief and time is short before the opportunity expires to snap back sanctions,” Risch said. “We cannot afford to wait until the end of August. Initiating the snapback process would be the right and long overdue move.”