American Muslims for Palestine faces liability over its alleged ties to a group found to have backed the 1996 killing of 17-year-old David Boim
M. Spencer Green/AP
Joyce and Stanley Boim get into a cab outside federal court in Chicago in this Dec. 8, 2004, after three Islamic charities and an alleged fund-raiser for Hamas were ordered to pay $156 million to the parents, whose 17-year-old son, David, was shot and killed by terrorists in 1996.
A federal judge in Illinois has scheduled a Feb. 8, 2027, trial to determine whether the American Muslims for Palestine group can be held legally responsible for the 1996 murder of American teenager David Boim, according to a court document obtained by Jewish Insider. The landmark case could establish whether U.S. organizations are liable for funding Hamas terror operations.
In May 1996, 17-year-old David Boim, an American studying abroad at a yeshiva in Israel, was shot and killed by two Hamas terrorists at a bus stop. Boim was one of the first Americans killed by Hamas, which the U.S. later designated as a foreign terrorist organization. His murder sparked a decades-long legal battle as his parents, Stanley and Joyce Boim, have sought to hold the perpetrators and their alleged financial backers accountable through the American court system.
In 2017, Daniel Schlessinger, the Boims’ lead attorney, filed a lawsuit against AMP, a leading anti-Israel advocacy group with alleged ties to Hamas. The lawsuit accuses AMP of acting as an “alter ego” of the Islamic Association for Palestine, a now-defunct group that shut down after it was found to have provided material support to Hamas.
AMP describes itself as “a grassroots organization dedicated to advancing the movement for justice in Palestine by educating the American public about Palestine and its rich cultural, historical and religious heritage and through grassroots mobilization and advocacy.” But the nonprofit has come under renewed scrutiny since Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, terrorist attacks and the ensuing war in Gaza — in large part due to its ties to anti-Israel protests on college campuses.
After a 2004 landmark decision, the Boim family was awarded $156 million under the Anti-Terrorism Act to be paid by U.S.-based groups, including the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development and IAP, for providing material support to Hamas. The ruling established a precedent — organizations financing terrorist groups could now face significant civil liability and criminal penalties. After the ruling, the IAP ceased operations, and the Holy Land Foundation later closed after the U.S. government designated it a terrorist front.
Although a judge had previously ruled that AMP could not be considered what is legally described as an “alter ego” of the earlier organization, the ruling was overturned in 2022 and the case was reopened.
Next year’s trial could further “pave the way for American families who have been the victims of terror, in particular those killed or taken hostage in the Oct. 7 attacks, to seek justice in federal courts across the United States,” Schlessinger told JI.
Thirty years after Boim’s murder, Joyce Boim said she “still feels the pain every day” over the loss of her son.
“It is incredible to me that Hamas and the terrorist depravity it stands for continue to gain support around the world, including in the U.S.,” she said. “We are as determined as ever to pursue our case and obtain a small measure of justice for David, while also helping in the battle to fight Islamic terrorism.”
An article in El País called Judge Alvin Hellerstein a highly regarded jurist ‘despite’ being Jewish; the line was later removed
Angel Navarrete/Bloomberg via Getty Images
A woman sits on a street bench and reads a copy of El Pais newspaper in Madrid, Spain, on Tuesday, April 17, 2012.
Spain’s leading newspaper, El País, came under fire Tuesday for publishing an antisemitic comment about the Jewish background of the judge overseeing the case against deposed Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.
In a since-edited story, the left-leaning newspaper reported on Monday that federal Judge Alvin Hellerstein is a highly regarded jurist “despite being a recognized member of the Jewish community.”
Hellerstein is a 92-year-old Orthodox judge with 27 years on the federal bench in Manhattan, including presiding over high-profile trials such as lawsuits brought in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and a suit against disgraced Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein.
“Hellerstein, who studied law at Columbia University (New York), began his career as a clerk in the court he now presides over. Throughout his career, he has issued well-reasoned rulings and strived to maintain impartiality, despite being a prominent member of the Jewish community,” the article stated in Spanish. The end of the last sentence was removed on Tuesday.
Before it was edited, the story was reproduced by the Uruguayan El País, which also removed the line on Tuesday evening, following an inquiry from Jewish Insider. El País in Spain did not respond to multiple requests for comment from JI. (The two papers share no business connection other than syndication.)
The European Jewish Congress condemned El País, writing that “Jewish identity is not a conflict of interest. Such language reinforces bias and has real consequences for how Jews are perceived in public life. Media have a responsibility to avoid words that legitimize prejudice and to correct them when they do.”
Judge Alvin Hellerstein became a law clerk because firms would not hire an Orthodox lawyer; now, he cites Torah from the bench
Screenshot/ Blavatnik Archive, Oral History Project
Judge Alvin Hellerstein
Judge Alvin Hellerstein is 92 years old, and with 27 years on the federal bench in Manhattan, he has presided over some of the most prominent trials in recent memory — including thousands of lawsuits brought in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, a suit against disgraced Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein and, now, the criminal case against deposed Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.
It’s a remarkable final chapter in a legal career that was once nearly derailed by antisemitism. Hellerstein has described his judicial style as being influenced by Judge Edmund Palmieri, for whom Hellerstein served as a law clerk in the 1950s. (Ruth Bader Ginsburg, later a Supreme Court justice, clerked for Palmieri a few years later.) But that chapter almost didn’t happen. Hellerstein wanted to work at a law firm, but he ended up applying to clerkships because he said the non-Jewish law firms in New York would not hire him.
“As a Jewish boy coming to interview at law firms, you met up with very strong discrimination, some of it overt, most of it implied,” Hellerstein said in an interview in 2020 on the podcast “Behind the Bima.” He ended up working at a Jewish firm — one of the first Orthodox lawyers to be employed at any New York City firm.
“I was pleased to say that after me, that there were others, and some credit me with having broken the precedent,” Hellerstein said. “When I became a judge, it didn’t make any difference if I was Orthodox or not. It made no difference if I was religious or not. My capabilities as a lawyer were measured, as well as my character and other characteristics, but there was no discrimination.”
Now, the eyes of not just the legal profession but the world will be upon Hellerstein as he oversees the federal criminal case against Maduro following the brazen U.S. capture of the controversial Venezuelan leader. Maduro pleaded not guilty on Monday in his first court appearance in New York, where he faces narco-terrorism and weapons charges.
Hellerstein was nominated to serve as a federal district judge in the Southern District of New York by President Bill Clinton in 1998. In 2011, he assumed senior status, which means he hears fewer cases than he once did. (President Barack Obama nominated Jesse Furman, also an observant Jew, to fill Hellerstein’s seat on the bench.)
In his chambers, Hellerstein displays a sign bearing a Hebrew phrase from the book of Deuteronomy: “Tzedek tzedek tirdof,” it reads. “Justice, justice, you shall pursue.”
Hellerstein has spoken often about a case he presided over nearly two decades ago, in which a Mexican immigrant truck driver faced drug charges related to narcotics planted in his truck by a different driver. Hellerstein helped the defendant obtain legal counsel, and the case was ultimately dismissed by federal prosecutors — saving the defendant from prison and deportation. When the truck driver appeared in front of Hellerstein, thanking him and crying, Hellerstein invoked that passage from the Torah.
“I told him about the sign I had in my office, tzedek tzedek tirdof,” Hellerstein said in the 2020 interview. “I told him that there are many reasons that are given for the repetition, but the one I favor is that we don’t know where justice is. We have to pursue it. We have to look for it. And when an opportunity is given to have justice in the courtroom, justice in the eyes of the defense counsel, justice in the eyes of the prosecutor, justice in the eyes of the judge and the public, we have to thank him [the defendant] for giving us this opportunity.”
Hellerstein has been active in Jewish communal life for decades. Before he was appointed to the federal bench, Hellerstein served as president of the Board of Jewish Education of Greater New York. He has also been a philanthropic supporter of The Jewish Center, an Orthodox synagogue on the Upper West Side, and AMIT, a network of schools in Israel. According to a 2016 New York Times article, Hellerstein played tennis with three rabbis weekly for more than 45 years.
But Hellerstein has long said that being Jewish does not influence the decisions he reaches as a judge.
“I would not want it to be said that I ruled in a certain way because I am an Orthodox Jew, and I would not want to feel that my Jewish upbringing or values cause me to rule in one way and not another,” Hellerstein wrote in a 2013 article in the Touro Law Review. “My rulings, over thirteen years of judging, are my record. They reflect all that influenced me … indeed, all my life experiences, and, certainly, my Jewish education and my Jewish values. But, above all these influences, there is one category that stands pre-eminent — the Constitution, statutes, and cases that I swore as a judge to follow and uphold.”
In the 2020 interview, recorded during the High Holy Days, Hellerstein was asked by Rabbi Philip Moskowitz of Boca Raton Synagogue what advice he, as a judge, would share ahead of Yom Kippur, the ultimate judgment day.
“You’re in a much better place than I am to make those suggestions,” he quipped to the rabbi. “I do feel that I have to account for what I do. Part of my accountability is to the Court of Appeals, where I can be reversed, and I often am. Another is my account to the individuals involved directly in the process. And third, I have to account to God. My purpose in life is to be as good a judge as I can be, and I have to ask for strength and wisdom in performing that job.”
Please log in if you already have a subscription, or subscribe to access the latest updates.



































































Continue with Google
Continue with Apple